Problematic Software List known interferences with eMule
#41
Posted 24 March 2003 - 01:45 AM
- Crash every few hours
- Limit the number of connection <500
- Do a weird total system pause every few minutes
Solved by moving to Sygate Personal Firewall...
System:
Dual P3-1Ghz
1Gb SD Ram
GF4400 128MB
2 * 120B drives stripped
Hope this helps some people out there.
#42
Posted 25 March 2003 - 09:00 AM
Khzarn, on Mar 18 2003, 08:33 PM, said:
Running Windows XP on an Athlon XP 2000+, 512 MB, Abit KX7 and Hercules Fortissimo II soundcard.
Yup, same problem here. with version 0.24 everything works smooth. First the PC is stuttering, the mouse isn't moving, then the PC reboots.
My machine: 1Ghz Athlon, Asus a7v, Geforce 256, terratec 128pci
Programs in background are: Sygate PFW, SetiHide Client, Antivir Personal Edition
i already disabled antivir, firewall, but the reboot problem remains.
Any help or ideas are welcome
#43
Posted 30 March 2003 - 08:48 PM
#44
Posted 01 April 2003 - 05:31 PM
Quote
Other clients (and probably servers) remember your IP for awhile. Since they are trying to connect to something that no longer is active, your firewall should report the attempts.
If it didn't under 2000, then the firewall reporting/logging was different or you had a different rule in effect.
As for software that doesn't work with eMule, I'd have to put Zone Alarm Pro in. It screws up many things on my machine. Even breaks BIND randomly. No answer from their support staff for over 8 months now. "We'll get back with you". Lousy program with worse support. Sygate is very nice for a freebee.
#45
Posted 03 April 2003 - 05:15 AM
Archmage, on Jan 20 2003, 05:55 PM, said:
I used to have that kind of problems. Its because of low number of connections that can handle Win 98 / Me.
To solve this try to put no more than 10 in "max new of connections / 5 seconds" and disable source exchanging in your preferences or it will crash constatly. It worked for me.
If you can upgrade to Win XP, a way much more stable whit no emule crashes
#46
Posted 04 April 2003 - 06:29 AM
Hengst, on Jan 29 2003, 02:42 PM, said:
fire wall isnt very nessary for a dial-up connection....
#47
Posted 14 April 2003 - 06:41 PM
It was a little time ago, and now Emule seems to be running smoothly...
I would like to thank you all for this!.
-Will-
#48
Posted 15 April 2003 - 12:00 AM
kyo16, on Jan 20 2003, 12:28 PM, said:
With emule it reports lot of "Invalid TCP destination 0.0.x.x".
No harm but annoying.
If you are using Norton firewall and get annoying security alerts such like "invalid TCP destination" you can just turn of the monitoring of that kind alerts. Such alerts are not harmful, but like you said annoying.
To do that, open norton firewall, and click on "intruder configuration", click on "signatures", and you will get up a list of intruder alert messeges. Click and add the annoying alerts you don't want to see any more. When you do this, norton firewall will block the "intruders", but you won't get an alert about it.
XlT10
#49
Posted 21 April 2003 - 09:24 PM
kl_3141, on Apr 4 2003, 06:29 AM, said:
Hengst, on Jan 29 2003, 02:42 PM, said:
fire wall isnt very nessary for a dial-up connection....
actually a firewall is always a good idea, no matter what type of net connection you have.
#50
Posted 22 April 2003 - 02:55 AM
I have WinXP Home 512 DDR Ram on 1 GHZ AMD with ADSL connection with eMule only using 50% and haveing these things together really screws with the computer. If anyone could PM me a Firewall/AV that works as well as norton... (Or a lot like it; In fact, able to import the Port settings I have) I'd appriciate it..
#51
Posted 24 April 2003 - 09:19 PM
Tcp Checksum error. 68.144.12.79, time:1690641, Frg=0x40
Tcp Checksum error. 68.144.12.79, time:1694406, Frg=0x40
Tcp Checksum error. 68.144.12.79, time:1736506, Frg=0x40
Tcp Checksum error. 68.144.12.79, time:1759069, Frg=0x40
UDP Checksum error. time: 1846264, Frg=0x4500
Tcp Checksum error. 68.144.12.79, time:1858822, Frg=0x40
Tcp Checksum error. 68.144.12.79, time:1902966, Frg=0x40
They do not occur unless eMule is active. All the other client machines can be doing any other task (web, email, downloads, gaming online, FTP, etc) and these messages are never generated. IN a really bad case Sygate Home Network will eventually stopp passing traffic because of these errors, at which point the messages in the log become:
CGenericTcp::CGenericTcp(ERR) cannot alloc tcp port.
CEngineCore::Unable to establish TCP tunnel. Engine may exceed maximum user limit.
CGenericTcp::CGenericTcp(ERR) cannot alloc tcp port.
CEngineCore::Unable to establish TCP tunnel. Engine may exceed maximum user limit.
CGenericTcp::CGenericTcp(ERR) cannot alloc tcp port.
CEngineCore::Unable to establish TCP tunnel. Engine may exceed maximum user limit.
I have troubleshot this error very well and can say for certain that eMule is somehow responsible (I've even replaced both NICs in the Sygate server as well as built a clean server install on a different PC to ensure it was nothing to do with the original machine). In addition I have a friend using Sygate and eMule also and had him send me his logfile and the TCP/UDP errors are in his as well.
#52
Posted 29 April 2003 - 02:12 AM
may sound weird but large internet explorer downloads >10mb always d/l corrupt, or IE reports false file size and only downloads up to that smaller filesize. shutting down emule, and clicking on the same link produces usually a larger filesize and a uncorrupted file
#53
Posted 07 May 2003 - 06:33 AM
http://www.emule-pro...&f=3&t=17367&s=
#54
Posted 09 May 2003 - 11:23 AM
#55
Posted 12 May 2003 - 10:14 PM
#56
Posted 13 May 2003 - 02:45 PM
Considering that Emule has a "green pass" with the firewall, why do I get blocked incoming logs to port 4662 (emule's TCP default port)? It makes sence that this traffic should pass because of Emule being configured to let it all pass.
I am going to try and install Kerio's Personal firewall tonight and see what happens.
#57
Posted 15 May 2003 - 12:10 PM
DRIVER IRQ NOT LESS THAN OR EQUAL
Error
I running Win xp pro with 768MD DDR and SP1
#58
Posted 21 May 2003 - 01:11 PM
Agent_Smith, on Feb 9 2003, 06:10 AM, said:
Just FYI.
I have no problem with NAV2002 & NAV2003 when i'm running eMule
The problem with "Invalid part.met fileversion!" in v0.28b sucks big time! - just lost 2GB of partial downloaded files - and no, donkeydocter dosn't work!
Internet Kommunisme:
Upload what u can!
Download what u need!
#59
Posted 25 May 2003 - 05:25 PM
Kevin_R, on May 15 2003, 09:10 AM, said:
DRIVER IRQ NOT LESS THAN OR EQUAL
Error
I running Win xp pro with 768MD DDR and SP1
The last time I saw someone with that IRQ error, it was because they had a bad stick of RAM.
Better check it out.
#60
Posted 30 May 2003 - 10:42 AM
Quote
Reduce your max connections it should fix your problem. Try something as low as 50 and work your way up. Your router cannot handle so many connections and that is y you have trouble with other sw.