Official eMule-Board: Emule Shall Encourage Speed Over Seeding - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1

Emule Shall Encourage Speed Over Seeding Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Fensergeist 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 09-June 06

Posted 21 October 2016 - 03:55 PM

When the eD2K network was created, there were very few people with Internet and connections were slow. That is why eD2K encouraged seeding over fast downloads.

These days the abundance of potential high speed seeders is huge, but eD2K stills is rooted in the old model of handling downloads. That's why Bittorrent is taking over eMule, even when eMule is more powerful on performing searches and sharing new files.

I want you to encourage changing the design of eD2K, so it prioritises speed over seeding. Personally I think this is the thing that would have the highest impact on P2P sharing worldwide right now.

This post has been edited by Fensergeist: 21 October 2016 - 03:56 PM

0

#2 User is offline   Fensergeist 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 09-June 06

Posted 21 October 2016 - 04:25 PM

Also suggested to aMule.
0

#3 User is offline   sonoro 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 147
  • Joined: 02-July 06

Posted 21 October 2016 - 05:19 PM

that already exist in the ed2k! http://forum.emule-p...showtopic=42232

Your problem is not come in the official client in standard mode!

Yes ed2k would be much faster.

I do not have enough power to change it, but if he sees embedded in the official client would change much!

In time I remember there was a community that took slotfocus party currently do not know is active!
0

#4 User is offline   sonoro 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 147
  • Joined: 02-July 06

Posted 21 October 2016 - 05:22 PM

Fensergeist is wonderful as meet with multiple clients with active slotfocus.
0

  • Member Options

Page 1 of 1

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users