Official eMule-Board: Protocol Obfuscation: Is It Common So Far? - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

Protocol Obfuscation: Is It Common So Far?

#1 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 581
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 27 March 2016 - 12:08 PM

Back in the days of 0.48 and co, people had surely power for handling protocol obfuscation, but maybe they were not aware of it. Now there are billions of guides about emule config, so my question is: does anyone has an idea about how common is to find clients with protocol obfuscation active? I would expect that, lowid or not, many of them would be able to support it, but my recent experiences after 3 years of stop are somewhat limited.
>>> My wiki (ITA) on emule >>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, ClientAnalyzer(fixing fastXs and reask punishment),, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.

  • Member Options

Page 1 of 1

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users