Emule 0.50A [Katana 2.11] legal babysteps :)
#41
Posted 26 May 2010 - 06:16 PM
Sorry, I wasn't clear in the sentence... I wanted to say:
Shouldn't "ul/dl ratio" be "dl/ul ratio" (from the perspective of the known client that is sending data)?
come ottenere aiuto italian guides - guide della sezione italiana
italian support - sezione italiana scaricare la lista server
ottenere id alto impostare le porte nel router
recuperare file corrotti i filtri ip
Sembra talco ma non č serve a darti l'allegrIa! Se lo lanci e poi lo respiri ti dā subito l'allegrIa!
#42
Posted 26 May 2010 - 06:45 PM
I also have another question: i didn't find nothing about AutoDownloadPriority (ADP) and i don't understand how does it work. Is there something (text, wiki) that can explain me how to set its options (fixed percentage and partfile completition)?
Thanks in advance.
This post has been edited by dylandog84: 26 May 2010 - 06:47 PM
#43
Posted 26 May 2010 - 07:31 PM
DynADP is a way to priorize downloading files by completition or fixed percentages. The fixed percentage version will set the priority according your setting, e.g. give all files above 75% to normal and all files above 90% on high priority, the rest is set to low. The completition-based version will create a sorted list of your downloads and put a settable number of files (with support of categories) to high and normal prio, anything else will be set to low.
#44
Posted 27 May 2010 - 04:22 AM
Any indication yet whether this is happening because it's the way CA is supposed to operate or a bug somewhere?
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control
Quote
#45
Posted 27 May 2010 - 05:35 AM
p!ll3.p4ll0, on 25 Mai 2010 - 09:57 , said:
#46
Posted 28 May 2010 - 03:30 AM
p!ll3.p4ll0, on 27 May 2010 - 06:35 AM, said:
p!ll3.p4ll0, on 25 Mai 2010 - 09:57 , said:
If that's your answer, my interpretation is that there's a bug in Katana or CA because it's showing the skull anyway despite only having a "bad ul/dl" (and in some cases, having a good ul/dl). As I mentioned before, there is no "CA scoreratio" on the clientdetails tab, and that includes a case of a client who UL more than DL.
This post has been edited by James R. Bath: 28 May 2010 - 03:31 AM
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control
Quote
#47
Posted 28 May 2010 - 04:38 AM
[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]
No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
#48
Posted 28 May 2010 - 05:37 PM
Edit: Before the question comes, yes, the CA score will be moved to the Antileech tab in next version for a better understanding.
This post has been edited by p!ll3.p4ll0: 28 May 2010 - 05:41 PM
#49
Posted 30 May 2010 - 08:30 PM
Update: Xtended does have some much smaller freezes (nothing leading to DL/UL user disconnects), and they all seem related to interacting with the UI (clients, files, scrollbars). Maybe its partly a 50a interface thing.
This post has been edited by James R. Bath: 31 May 2010 - 06:03 PM
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control
Quote
#50
Posted 30 May 2010 - 08:52 PM
5/30/2010 1:30:31 PM: ... swapping CA data for ... (MLdonkey v3.0,None/OnUploadQueue/None) during verification
This post has been edited by James R. Bath: 30 May 2010 - 08:52 PM
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control
Quote
#51
Posted 30 May 2010 - 11:51 PM
p!ll3.p4ll0, on 28 May 2010 - 06:37 PM, said:
Your calculations seem fine, so there's a problem somewhere else.
I have only one user with a direct client comparison so far and, in this case, it involves not giving a skull where it should have been given. Katana gave it the normal icon, Tombstone skull'd it. First your screen grabs, then those from Tombstone:
Katana Antileech
Katana client
Tombstone
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control
Quote
#52
Posted 01 June 2010 - 12:27 PM
If i move the horizontal scroollbar to the right, the colors disappear, while if i come back, the downloads "magically" return to their color.
This post has been edited by dylandog84: 01 June 2010 - 06:34 PM
#53
Posted 02 June 2010 - 06:55 PM
James R. Bath, on 30 Mai 2010 - 10:52 , said:
James R. Bath, on 31 Mai 2010 - 01:51 , said:
I'll crosscheck the TS with what I merged over. Might take a while, as I'm short of time lately.
dylandog84, on 01 Juni 2010 - 02:27 , said:
If i move the horizontal scroollbar to the right, the colors disappear, while if i come back, the downloads "magically" return to their color.
It does not happen here on Win XP. Are you using Vista or 7? In that case it might be an issue with newer versions.
#54
Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:12 PM
p!ll3.p4ll0, on 02 June 2010 - 07:55 PM, said:
James R. Bath, on 31 Mai 2010 - 01:51 , said:
I'll crosscheck the TS with what I merged over. Might take a while, as I'm short of time lately.
It's not urgent, though more urgent than the color scroll "bug", which isn't having any impact on my colors. The CA system is not constantly providing bad results. Just a little quirky. I'd prefer to see things like my other feature requests first.
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control
Quote
#55
Posted 04 June 2010 - 05:13 PM
p!ll3.p4ll0, on 02 June 2010 - 08:55 PM, said:
I'm using XP SP3. After a clean installation i can reproduce this "bug" (this happens on my OS, but i don't know if is the same thing also for the other users):
- i open katana;
- i disable the mod display option called "only color names";
- i connect to server/kad;
- i put a file to download;
- i wait that the file becomes "colored" and then i enable the new download commands toolbar.
Regards
This post has been edited by dylandog84: 04 June 2010 - 05:30 PM
#57
Posted 05 June 2010 - 03:13 PM
as said before, there seems not to be a single board you're not on, I guess
@dylandog84
Thx for the details. I do not have v2.0 running here at the moment, so I can't check it out right now. On the good side the current v2.1 beta seems not to show that behaviour on a quick test on XP SP3, maybe due to some changes around the FillSolidRect optimizations I added there lately.
#58
Posted 06 June 2010 - 01:47 PM
If I get some time I'll give it a go with a clean install and some fresh files.
#59
Posted 06 June 2010 - 01:57 PM
[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]
No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
#60
Posted 06 June 2010 - 02:31 PM
As Wizard already wrote he thinks to have actually thought of something when writing the CA, so he might have had an intention to keep both pairs of data side by side (for the splitting into rare/part/complete data I suppose). Using an unweightend set of total up/down as a base for both calculations would help to get both systems in line though. Although the data might be syncronized by adding/substracting the difference to/from the unweightend part of the CA score, but this would reduce efficency again and will paint a totally wrong picture if it happens too often.
This post has been edited by p!ll3.p4ll0: 06 June 2010 - 02:34 PM