Official eMule-Board: New Dlp (Dynamic Leecher Protection) - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content


  • (11 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11

New Dlp (Dynamic Leecher Protection) current version v 44 [16.04.11]

#181 User is offline   qysnn 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 24-December 09

Posted 02 July 2010 - 01:47 PM

Quote

according to the stuff of VeryCD, the project of easyMule2 had been stalled by themselves, and will not resume in a period.
the last version of easyMule2 is about one year ago. a buggy testversion. it means nothing, said by the stuff.
so, ban or unban easyMule2 means nothing, if they don't resume this project.

it has many users. And still offer the download url.
0

#182 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 02 July 2010 - 02:01 PM

Angvil, you heard zz_fly. if you got nothing to contribute don't post here. i will ensure this for zz_fly if you insist to try your luck!
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#183 User is offline   zz0fly 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 179
  • Joined: 22-August 08

Posted 02 July 2010 - 02:26 PM

View Postqysnn, on 02 July 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:

it has many users. And still offer the download url.

i see. i will reconsider this issue and make a decision before next version of dlp.
0

#184 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 19 December 2010 - 10:40 PM

v43 released.

This post has been edited by Stulle: 19 December 2010 - 10:40 PM

I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#185 User is offline   mss73 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 22-December 03

Posted 24 December 2010 - 06:47 AM

Congratulaitions, mules and girls!

http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=124631
http://forum.emule-p...ndpost&p=894235

43 months :confused: :confused: :confused:
Someone dumped my Mule poor,
Tore his pads, no hope to mend.
But I'll never leave him, sure,
Cause I love my fluffy friend!
(Rus: Уронили Мула на пол, оторвали Мулу лапу. Все равно его не брошу - потому что он хороший!)
0

#186 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:50 AM

irony goes here, please: http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=101042

if you are dissatisfied you are free to use whatever you please but don't bitch.
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#187 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 16 April 2011 - 05:25 PM

new version available!
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#188 User is offline   Ejack79 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 155
  • Joined: 25-August 09

Posted 18 April 2011 - 12:52 AM

Hi Stulle, I have a small question:

Why is "PBF on incompleted files" always taken as a bad feature? Does it mean someone tried to achieve an unfair boost?

I have checked in source codes but found nothing about it. I can't get it yet...
0

#189 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 18 April 2011 - 05:48 AM

If you use such a feature extensively, you will resort to trading instead of sharing... which is bad from the networks POV.
0

#190 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 18 April 2011 - 06:32 AM

Exactly. The same applies for the Justice CS which is also designed for trading instead of sharing... exclusively, actually. And it is in the source code, I checked it.
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#191 User is offline   once375ml 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 12-June 05

Posted 23 April 2011 - 01:30 PM

Can DLP 44 ban this client ?

He may be a mod-faker and on my queue for weeks


Posted Image

This post has been edited by once375ml: 23 April 2011 - 01:32 PM

-= MoD WANTED =-

1. SlotFocus
2. Import Part(s) from a file
3. CA
4. ClientPercentage
5. IP2Country
6. Not MorphXT, IT IS TOO HEAVY!


0

#192 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 23 April 2011 - 05:59 PM

Looks like a perfectly good client. MorphXT 11.3 still had a fix that caused it to send a different modstring (MorphXT 9.7) to circumvent a problem with an earlier version of MorphXT.

Certain features, however, might cause some clients to stall in the queue. So you might not advance in the queue because, for instance, other clients keep getting pushed in front of you (e.g. via PowerShare or FairPlay).
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#193 User is offline   once375ml 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 12-June 05

Posted 24 April 2011 - 04:26 AM

View PostStulle, on 24 April 2011 - 01:59 AM, said:

Looks like a perfectly good client. MorphXT 11.3 still had a fix that caused it to send a different modstring (MorphXT 9.7) to circumvent a problem with an earlier version of MorphXT.

Certain features, however, might cause some clients to stall in the queue. So you might not advance in the queue because, for instance, other clients keep getting pushed in front of you (e.g. via PowerShare or FairPlay).



Does MorphXT 10.4 send the same bugy MorphXT 9.7 modstring ?



Posted Image
-= MoD WANTED =-

1. SlotFocus
2. Import Part(s) from a file
3. CA
4. ClientPercentage
5. IP2Country
6. Not MorphXT, IT IS TOO HEAVY!


0

#194 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5754
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 24 April 2011 - 08:08 AM

Any MorphXT from the 10.x and and 11.x cycle send this.
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#195 User is offline   once375ml 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 12-June 05

Posted 24 April 2011 - 03:28 PM

View PostStulle, on 24 April 2011 - 04:08 PM, said:

Any MorphXT from the 10.x and and 11.x cycle send this.



OK! My mood smooth !!
-= MoD WANTED =-

1. SlotFocus
2. Import Part(s) from a file
3. CA
4. ClientPercentage
5. IP2Country
6. Not MorphXT, IT IS TOO HEAVY!


0

#196 User is offline   Ejack79 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 155
  • Joined: 25-August 09

Posted 31 December 2012 - 01:37 AM

qobfxb issue:

Modstring with 'qobfxb' should be stated hard leecher, but in DLPCheckNameAndHashAndMod() a qobfxb with specific userhash is detected 'Community Userhash' and will be classified soft leecher.
	static const TCHAR refuserhash13[]= _T("CB42F563EE0EA7907395420CAC146FF5"); //From "qobfxb" multi user [DargonD] 


So refuserhash13[] and all related lines should be removed.
0

#197 User is offline   Riso64Bit 

  • Magnificent Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 338
  • Joined: 24-March 09

Posted 04 January 2013 - 01:01 PM

View PostEjack79, on 31 December 2012 - 02:37 AM, said:

qobfxb issue:

Modstring with 'qobfxb' should be stated hard leecher, but in DLPCheckNameAndHashAndMod() a qobfxb with specific userhash is detected 'Community Userhash' and will be classified soft leecher.
	static const TCHAR refuserhash13[]= _T("CB42F563EE0EA7907395420CAC146FF5"); //From "qobfxb" multi user [DargonD] 


So refuserhash13[] and all related lines should be removed.



"qobfxb" is not the modstring, is only the username.
0

#198 User is offline   Ejack79 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 155
  • Joined: 25-August 09

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:39 AM

View PostRiso64Bit, on 04 January 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:

"qobfxb" is not the modstring, is only the username.


Oops, yes, my negligence. :P
0

#199 User is offline   SS1900 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3694
  • Joined: 15-November 08

Posted 28 December 2013 - 04:46 PM

you should upgrade the DLP ...because it bans some "old and new" clients :

26/12/2013 21:37:50: [Bad Modstring Scheme](ban)- Client ****** (eMule v0.50a [NetF WARP | SVN: 121],Connecting/None/None)
26/12/2013 21:37:50: [extra bytes](ban)- Client ***** '(PGoW) ***** [WCNmT]' (eMule v0.50a [kMule Build20131225],Connecting/None/None)


:angelnot: :flowers:
0

#200 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 28 December 2013 - 08:06 PM

^^ A hint to that issue: this is prolly because of SCT support which uses the old "pr" tag in hello (eDonkey) - this "detection" should be changed ASAP :flowers:
0

  • Member Options

  • (11 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users