Official eMule-Board: Analyzzul Mod - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content


  • (7 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Last »

Analyzzul Mod ZZUL & Client Analyzer ... very, very bad code :)

#41 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 18 May 2008 - 03:22 PM

%5B and %5D are no HTML code.
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#42 User is offline   Quezl 

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 272
  • Joined: 08-June 04

Posted 19 May 2008 - 09:34 AM

View PostTuxman, on May 18 2008, 05:22 PM, said:

%5B and %5D are no HTML code.

URL escape characters


Is it normal for this Client Analyzer to ban 32 out of 73 clients on my queue? This is the first time I use a client with this modification so I don't know, maybe it's totally normal, maybe not.

This post has been edited by Quezl: 19 May 2008 - 09:48 AM

0

#43 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 19 May 2008 - 10:04 AM

View PostQuezl, on May 19 2008, 11:34 AM, said:

Is it normal for this Client Analyzer to ban 32 out of 73 clients on my queue? This is the first time I use a client with this modification so I don't know, maybe it's totally normal, maybe not.

Very strange... because the analyzer doesn't ban anyone!
0

#44 User is offline   aSceT 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 14-July 07

Posted 19 May 2008 - 10:04 AM

View PostTuxman, on May 16 2008, 01:45 PM, said:

Why do you always want more and even more features?
Is there anything you can't live without in this mod?

:rolleyes:

Well, after trying many various mods in search for an ultimate one i discovered many various useful features that never was combined together in one user-friendly and not heavy-weight modification... So i'm just trying to fulfill my dream of an 'ultimate' mod here :)

This post has been edited by aSceT: 19 May 2008 - 10:04 AM

0

#45 User is offline   Quezl 

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 272
  • Joined: 08-June 04

Posted 19 May 2008 - 11:51 AM

View PosttHeWiZaRdOfDoS, on May 19 2008, 12:04 PM, said:

Very strange... because the analyzer doesn't ban anyone!

Hm, my bad. I believe you that. :flowers: Looking into the verbose log, the only messages that are related to the bans are these:

Kad: Request flood detected for opcode 0x43 (0x43) from IP 207.171.62.32 - Droping packets with this opcode
Kad: Massive request flood detected for opcode 0x43 (0x43) from IP 207.171.62.13 - Banning IP
Client UDP socket: prot=0xe4  opcode=0x4b  sizeaftercrypt=164 realsize=164  ***NOTE: Received unrequested response packet, size (162) in Kademlia::CKademliaUDPListener::Process_KADEMLIA2_PUBLISH_RES: 207.171.62.14:18369
Client UDP socket: prot=0xe4  opcode=0x19  sizeaftercrypt=187 realsize=187  ***NOTE: Received unrequested response packet, size (185) in Kademlia::CKademliaUDPListener::Process_KADEMLIA2_HELLO_RES: 72.172.92.44:25905


All of them come from two subranges:
207.171.62.xxx and 72.172.92.xxx

It doesn't seem to be a bug in the mod at all, but some sort of flood attack on KAD from some anti-P2P people.

This post has been edited by Quezl: 19 May 2008 - 11:57 AM

0

#46 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 19 May 2008 - 12:22 PM

Right... and the anti-fooding measurements are implemented in the official client.
0

#47 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 19 May 2008 - 12:30 PM

View PostaSceT, on May 19 2008, 12:04 PM, said:

So i'm just trying to fulfill my dream of an 'ultimate' mod here :)

This is actually not the intention of the AnalyZZUL.
Maybe it's a chance for you to find out what's actually important.

;)

edit:
I think banning is the right solution this time...

:angelnot:

This post has been edited by Tuxman: 19 May 2008 - 12:32 PM

[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#48 User is offline   Quezl 

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 272
  • Joined: 08-June 04

Posted 19 May 2008 - 05:21 PM

@aSceT and others: ZZUL and AnalyZZUL are meant to be light-weigt. That's their purpose and that's why people (including me) like them. And for the maintainers of the mods more features mean more work and inevitably more bugs which means even more work. When a maintainer doesn't want to add a feature then it's up to him alone.

Analyzzul was probably not meant to become a new super-releaser-mod (at least not for now), but merely just ZZUL + one specific anti-leeching protection.

Anyway, if it's only this single feature that you really want and don't like other mods that have it because of their many more features, then maybe try to patch Analyzzul yourself... get Visual Studio, the library pack and give it a try. The hardest part is to get the offical/mod source to compile in the first place with a newer version of Visual Studio. But be aware that in case of phpBB-style forum links it's not done with adding just that code snippet posted above... you also have to edit the resource file and add a tick box in the appropiate dialog and as I already said the above code will probably not escape "[" and "]" and thus break the phpBB forum post in case the file name contains these characters. If you want working code that doesn't break forum posts, look at the MorphXT client's source.
0

#49 User is offline   aSceT 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 14-July 07

Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:06 PM

Tuxman, as a releaser, i'm pretty certain of most features i need :) (i even has - virtually - elaborated one new feature for fast & fair spreading of releases, although i don't know who of mods might be interested to listen and try to implement it)
Now the question is: will you consider them as useful on not :-k
0

#50 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:11 PM

I don't want to create another all-purpose mod with thousands of blinking lights everywhere, that's it.
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#51 User is offline   LorenzoC 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2478
  • Joined: 05-September 04

Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:36 PM

I've always thought that MOST features in mods are useless, sometime even negative.
There are only very few things you can actually improve/tweak.
The ZZUL mod covers already almost every useful/needed feature for releasing.

(releasing doens't need any exotic CS, country flags, etc, releasing is just about uploading files)

This post has been edited by LorenzoC: 19 May 2008 - 08:38 PM

0

#52 User is offline   aSceT 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 14-July 07

Posted 20 May 2008 - 02:39 AM

Tuxman said:

I don't want to create another all-purpose mod with thousands of blinking lights everywhere, that's it.

Did i said something about "blinking lights"? :confused: As i said before: only something really useful that will work embedded, without user interaction (such as kad autoupdate) and i didn't said anything bout graphic or GUI enchantments...

This post has been edited by aSceT: 20 May 2008 - 02:45 AM

0

#53 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 20 May 2008 - 04:42 AM

@ aSceT:
So which feature you actually need doesn't require any "GUI enhancements"?

:)
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#54 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 20 May 2008 - 05:45 AM

View PostaSceT, on May 19 2008, 10:06 PM, said:

Tuxman, as a releaser, i'm pretty certain of most features i need :) (i even has - virtually - elaborated one new feature for fast & fair spreading of releases, although i don't know who of mods might be interested to listen and try to implement it)
Now the question is: will you consider them as useful on not :-k

OT: me would willingly apply :flowers:
0

#55 User is offline   LorenzoC 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2478
  • Joined: 05-September 04

Posted 20 May 2008 - 02:52 PM

@Tuxman & everybody who knows the CA.

I've tried NextEMF mod that has got the CA and the AnalyZZUL with the CA. I noticed that NextEMF gives 0 rating to "AppleJxxx" mods, of course those with the username or modstring while AnalyZZUL gives rating 100, it seems it doens't care of them.
Just for curiosity, what is the difference?
0

#56 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 20 May 2008 - 03:25 PM

Maybe the NextEMF has got an additional AJ check or sth?
(I don't know its feature list too well...)

But the purpose of the Analyzer is IMHO to get away from those string-based punishing lists...
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#57 User is offline   LorenzoC 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2478
  • Joined: 05-September 04

Posted 20 May 2008 - 03:32 PM

Unfortunately I can't compare EmuleFuture mod because it doens't work on my Win2K...
Yes I know the purpose of the CA yet the curiosity about two different behaviours remains.

This post has been edited by LorenzoC: 20 May 2008 - 03:32 PM

0

#58 User is offline   dennisw 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 31-May 04

Posted 20 May 2008 - 04:41 PM

the eMuleFuture and NextEMF have the "More GPLEvilDoers" from WiZaRd.

 3451 //>>> WiZaRd::More GPLEvilDoers
//these clients CAN IMPOSSIBLY be used as "good" mods - thus they do not deserve a single byte - very sad...
//personally, I'd like to send a message to those users to notify them because most do not know what they do
//but this could be considered spam... :(
#define MISC_GPL_CHECKS \
|| strBuffer.Find(L"APPLEJUICE") != -1 \
|| strBuffer.Find(L"RC-ATLANTIS") != -1 \
|| strBuffer.Find(L"SUNPOWER") != -1 \
|| strBuffer.Find(L"ROCKFORCE") != -1
 




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PC 1:

22" TFT LG LW226,Intel CoreDuo E8400@3,2GHZ,Abit P35 Pro,4096 MB DDR2 Ram MDT 5-5-5-12,1x 500GB Samsung HD501LJ SATA2,XFX Nvidia Geforce 8800GTS 320MB,Creative Xifi Music,NEC DVD-RW 3540A - FW 1WB Liggy,Optiarc DVD-RW 7173A- FW 1-M1 Liggy,Windows Vista Ultimate 64Bit SP1 - Dualboot - Mandriva 2008.1 Spring Linux

Laptop:

Intel Pentium M 1,83 GHZ,2GB Ram DDR400,160GB HDD Seagate,Radeon 9700 SE 128MB,Windows Vista Business 32Bit SP1 - Dualboot - openSuse 10.3 - Dualboot
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

#59 User is offline   LorenzoC 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2478
  • Joined: 05-September 04

Posted 20 May 2008 - 04:54 PM

Thanks for the explanation :)

This post has been edited by LorenzoC: 20 May 2008 - 04:54 PM

0

#60 User is offline   gav616 

  • Magnificent Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 20-July 06

Posted 20 May 2008 - 07:14 PM

View PostLorenzoC, on May 14 2008, 09:58 PM, said:

For the above reasons I would prefer a client without CS and with SUQWT instead, right because I belive the trading the "wrong" idea of fairness. Of course you can disagree but I am always puzzled by people who can't separate upload from the idea of being "rewarded". It is only good when you upload to other clients than the ones that are uploading to you, while it is wrong when you upload to the same clients you are downloading from. In the first case your queue is "open", you are uploading all files you are sharing, in the second your queue is "closed", you are uploading only files you are downloading.


its here, just disable CS (i just thought) :flowers:
0

  • Member Options

  • (7 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Last »

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users