[leuk_he]

In debug mode i freqeunt get an assert in tag.h:

....
class CKadTag
....
virtual uint64 GetInt() const
{
ASSERT(0);
return 0;
}


Why?

This post has been edited by leuk_he: 03 February 2007 - 01:58 PM

[tHeWiZaRdOfDoS]

Obviously KAD tags aren't supposed to support ints > _UI32_MAX (yet?) - where do those asserts originate? I ran eMule for hours in debug mode but no asserts so far...

[erpirata]

you resolve the problem if reset your fix with that original of emule

This post has been edited by erpirata: 17 February 2007 - 10:53 AM

[tHeWiZaRdOfDoS]

What fix are you talkin' about?
Considering your latest contributions and "bug fixes" I guess it'd be better to just ignore your posts until you can distinguish bugs, asserts and mere warnings...

[erpirata]

tHeWiZaRdOfDoS, on Feb 17 2007, 08:38 PM, said:

What fix are you talkin' about?
Considering your latest contributions and "bug fixes" I guess it'd be better to just ignore your posts until you can distinguish bugs, asserts and mere warnings...

I make a report on me the present fix on the morph, because I have found this problem only trying the morph, if you is compares the version of the morph with emule excluding the functions added himself you find launch fix and this fix causes this error.

Consider that if I try only emule (original) doesn't give me this error and if try the morph gives the error, in accordance with you, does will be to mean?

For me every message during the compilation is problem to resolve, because it means that something goes fixed, independently from her gravity. It same farewell for the deriving messages from the debug.

I am able is inexperienced in comparison with you but am not stupid, give me some month and you will see that am able arrive to your level, if doesn't overcome you (perhaps).

Remembered that is not ended never to learn, and some times you even learns from the stupids. Then you is not wise, behaviour the superiors and ignore them.

The solutions of the times are more simple, of what is thinks.

This post has been edited by erpirata: 18 February 2007 - 02:27 AM

[CiccioBastardo]

Consider a good thing also to invest at least 10% of the time you are going to use for learning programming also to learn a bit of English. To a level that doesn't require me to use google translator to revert your paragraphs into italian to understand them.
Thanks

[stormy1777]

I also see similar asserts in debug mode only, stack and some code as follows:

emule.exe!Kademlia::CKadTag::GetStr()  Line 159	C++
			virtual CKadTagValueString GetStr() const
			{
**>				ASSERT(0);
				return L"";
			}

emule.exe!Kademlia::CSearch::ProcessResultFile(const Kademlia::CUInt128 & uAnswer={...}, std::list<Kademlia::CKadTag *,std::allocator<Kademlia::CKadTag *> > * plistInfo=0x046173b8)  Line 860 + 0x11	C++
		else if (!pTag->m_name.Compare(TAG_BUDDYHASH))
		{
**>			strmd4(pTag->GetStr(), ucharBuddyHash);
			md4cpy(uBuddy.GetDataPtr(), ucharBuddyHash);
		}
		else if (!pTag->m_name.Compare(TAG_ENCRYPTION))
			byCryptOptions = (uint8)pTag->GetInt();
emule.exe!Kademlia::CSearch::ProcessResult(const Kademlia::CUInt128 & uAnswer={...}, std::list<Kademlia::CKadTag *,std::allocator<Kademlia::CKadTag *> > * plistInfo=0x046173b8)  Line 814	C++
emule.exe!Kademlia::CSearchManager::ProcessResult(const Kademlia::CUInt128 & uTarget={...}, const Kademlia::CUInt128 & uAnswer={...}, std::list<Kademlia::CKadTag *,std::allocator<Kademlia::CKadTag *> > * plistInfo=0x046173b8)  Line 607	C++
emule.exe!Kademlia::CKademliaUDPListener::Process_KADEMLIA_SEARCH_RES(const unsigned char * pbyPacketData=0x04c55fda, unsigned int uLenPacket=3558)  Line 1325 + 0x11	C++

only solution was to rebuild without debug.. I don't know how to only compile a few without without debug..
just reporting.. I will try to drop the .release objects and see if I can relink the binary 'partly debug'

thanks.

[Some Support]

Asserts only fire in Debug-Builds, in this case its that a remote client has sent a Tag which we expect to be a String value, but it isn't. Most likely the remote client is not a official eMule build and misusing this tag for something else.
Nothing bad happens in this case through.

[stormy1777]

OK!! got it! thanks for the simple explanation, I really appreciate it!
I'm going to do a good deed today as repayment to the Universe