Official eMule-Board: Feature Requests - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content


  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »

Feature Requests

#21 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 02 September 2006 - 09:22 PM

well.. let's see how I organize it. The next weeks are a lot todo ( to code).. and then I'll think again about it.

@all who want the protocol-encryption:
I hope it's now obvious why I waited for official emule and didn't implement Davids encryption. I hope the new Protocol Obfuscation is a real improvement for the network.
0

#22 User is offline   welldl 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 29-October 05

Posted 03 September 2006 - 02:10 AM

I agree with you. official emule users more than each mod users. I think Mod is a pioneer and can try a lot of new feature first. But the number of Mod user is problem.

:-)

This post has been edited by welldl: 03 September 2006 - 02:32 AM

0

#23 User is offline   Haos 

  • Magnificent Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 343
  • Joined: 30-March 06

Posted 05 September 2006 - 10:05 AM

So the official Obfuscation is up and running, possibly solving our problems with throttling.

Then are you considering on introducing NAT-T into Xtreme?
Visit www.reactos.org - Opensource Operating System project,
desgined to be 100% compatible with Win 2000/XP

ReactOS Project - Tester and Polish translation team member


Now LowID to LowID connections are possible thanks to the first NAT & FireWall Traversal mod: NeoMule.


Polish Pirate Party:
0

#24 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 05 September 2006 - 01:08 PM

no NAT-T

and for the next version also no other new features are planed... first I need a stable 0.47b version. And at some points there are a lot todo.. Xtreme is too complex todo a simple merging.
0

#25 User is offline   elettronvolt 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 11-February 06

Posted 11 September 2006 - 08:22 AM

View PostRapid_Mule, on Sep 1 2006, 06:28 PM, said:

Xman can you edit the first post same as in Morph Feature request thread to point out features Implemented/Pending/Unwanted...etc.
:respect:


This would be very nice...and can be added a sort of disclaimer saying "don't ask when a pending future will be added or your post will be deleted" or something like that.

Anyway, has xtreme some kind of faster endgame? If not, do you think you will add in a next future netf-warp implementation or something similar?
0

#26 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 11 September 2006 - 09:11 AM

well, I didn't find the time to code a faster endgame.. maybe in the future. The current solutions aren't bad, but I prefer to write my own implementation.
0

#27 User is offline   R@UL 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: 09-August 06

Post icon  Posted 28 September 2006 - 09:36 AM

Xman thx for your great work :+1: . I have a small problem: I possess only 256 Mb di Ram. Then I ask:
I could have the function to activate/disactivate the flags?
Alternative: I can remove from the folder /conf the file ip-to-country.csv? I obtain the same thing?

I waited. Thk ;)
0

#28 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 28 September 2006 - 09:44 AM

Quote

Alternative: I can remove from the folder /conf the file ip-to-country.csv? I obtain the same thing?


thatīs the prefered way. If I put only a switch into the mod, it can be switched on and off.. which means the flags are always loaded but the user decide to show it or not. But if you delete/rename the cvs file emule donīt load it and you save some RAM.
0

#29 User is offline   R@UL 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: 09-August 06

Posted 28 September 2006 - 11:42 AM

Quote

If I put only a switch into the mod, it can be switched on and off.. which means the flags
are always loaded but the user decide to show it or not.


nevertheless I, with an other mod, have noticed minor a consumption of ram (approximately 8/10 mb) putting the flags in off :-k


:respect:
0

#30 User is offline   dieguti 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 22-November 02

Posted 29 September 2006 - 11:10 AM

Let's call it "Urgent request" by now.
I would work like this: I request a file to you in urgent mode and I have uploaded some files to you in the past.
So to calculate the ratio

Actual system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 2 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total + 2)

Proposed system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 4 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total x 2 + 2)
Uploaded Total = Uploaded Total / 4 (but only when the top of the queue is reach, to avoid lose credits without geting the file)

This way I would be "spending" my credits to get a file faster.
Advantages:
- The would reduce the differences between new and old clients. (between richs and poors :D )
- It would permit get a file faster for special occasions.
- It would give benefits to the typical uploader.

Well, what do you think?
0

#31 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5740
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 29 September 2006 - 01:04 PM

View Postdieguti, on Sep 29 2006, 11:10 AM, said:

Let's call it "Urgent request" by now.
I would work like this: I request a file to you in urgent mode and I have uploaded some files to you in the past.
So to calculate the ratio

Actual system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 2 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total + 2)

Proposed system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 4 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total x 2 + 2)
Uploaded Total = Uploaded Total / 4 (but only when the top of the queue is reach, to avoid lose credits without geting the file)

This way I would be "spending" my credits to get a file faster.
Advantages:
- The would reduce the differences between new and old clients. (between richs and poors :D )
- It would permit get a file faster for special occasions.
- It would give benefits to the typical uploader.

Well, what do you think?

consider using the lovelace credit system by either switching to scarangel or implenting it on your own.
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#32 User is offline   dieguti 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 22-November 02

Posted 29 September 2006 - 02:43 PM

View PostStulle, on Sep 29 2006, 03:04 PM, said:

consider using the lovelace credit system by either switching to scarangel or implenting it on your own.


I'll wait for the "official" answer :P
0

#33 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 29 September 2006 - 02:50 PM

looks like you want some kind of creditshaping. Answer: no!
0

#34 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 29 September 2006 - 02:52 PM

No he wants some kind of "AppleJuice" system... easily explained a protocol extension which allows you to directly use up your credits for immediate download.
0

#35 User is offline   dieguti 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 22-November 02

Posted 29 September 2006 - 03:57 PM

Perhaps I'm wrong, but i thought the creditshaping systems modify their behaviour uploading to obtain better download. And in fact, the bad is not upload with fairness.

What I propose is a better download now and a worse download during a period, until I gain credits again.
Furthermore, the credit system generates differences between newbies and veterans, and every time are greater. This system could alliviate the problem. :flowers:

Sometimes you must run to get the bus and later you will necessarily rest.
I can't see what is so bad of this mechanism. :confused:




Edit: corrections, my english is very bad :unsure:

This post has been edited by dieguti: 29 September 2006 - 04:11 PM

0

#36 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 29 September 2006 - 04:15 PM

well, as always wich such things, the abuse potntial is too high. You can be sure, all leecher want all files urgently.
0

#37 User is offline   dieguti 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 22-November 02

Posted 29 September 2006 - 10:35 PM

View PostXman1, on Sep 29 2006, 06:15 PM, said:

well, as always wich such things, the abuse potntial is too high. You can be sure, all leecher want all files urgently.

A leecher couldn't request an urgent file without MB uploaded previously.
You could force to have at least x MB uploaded to the client, not counting the credits of the last d days.
I dont see the potential abuse more than the credit system has itself.
0

#38 User is offline   Syst3m Crash3r 480 

  • Magnificent Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 380
  • Joined: 30-April 06

Posted 30 September 2006 - 05:14 PM

View PostSyst3m Crash3r 480, on Aug 23 2006, 08:48 PM, said:

As I said earlier, It would be nice if the disabling compression would be an option: people like me wants to share more, even if my pc will work more... ;-)


Excuse me, Xman1, but I up this post since the discussion became focused on NAT Traversal and similar...
Could you add this feature, please? :)

Best regards and good work! :+1:


0

#39 User is offline   InnFernno 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 105
  • Joined: 30-June 06

Posted 02 October 2006 - 12:08 PM

Hi Xman,

Would it be possible to see ZZ's Powershare In Xtreme mod?
Advancing eMule treasures...
0

#40 User is offline   Xman1 

  • Xtreme Modder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1955
  • Joined: 21-June 03

Posted 02 October 2006 - 12:15 PM

no, unwanted.. Powrrelease does already the job.. and I donīt like the idea to spread all your upload to one file, without giving other files a chance.
0

  • Member Options

  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users