[<Tino>]

Thanks for this mod. I love DBR feature

[Gomez82]

hello netfinity,
i have some problems with compiling your mod, now i have a question ...

What versions of the libs you use to compile (i get several error messages with the libs i use)

[netfinity]

@Gomez82
Should be the same versions as the official client. But the zlib need to be compiled with the ZLIB_WINAPI preprocessor definition. Also you should compile all libraries without the default libraries.

[Gomez82]

netfinity, on May 2 2006, 05:58 PM, said:

@Gomez82
Should be the same versions as the official client. But the zlib need to be compiled with the ZLIB_WINAPI preprocessor definition. Also you should compile all libraries without the default libraries.

thx i will try tomorrow ...

[moloko+]

hi netfinity,

SiRoB has posted a fix for ReadBlockFromThread here:

Topic: [fix] Filtered Block Request
http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=104788

cheers.

[Andu]

SiRoB is doing alot of optimising/fixing lately and it's rather hard to keep up. Morph and code snippet subforums are full of those.

I like that the modders seem to be more interested in improving their clients rather than bitching at each other. Way to go.

[moloko+]

hi Andu,
yeah, i'd be stuck if modders didn't post their solutions and folly here... no point in gripes anyways since we all learn bit by bit (even if i regret some of my own posts ).

its all information, which is anti personal and not owned by anyone (well you know what i mean), which is kinda the philosophy in p2p... it just sucks having the wrong info (...well embarrasing mostly)...

@Gomez82 :
i got ESE to compile on VS2003 .NET by copying the proj files from the 0.47a sources and adding SlugFiller SafeHash files to the project and a few other things (sorry can't remember)...

btw, did the compile work out (it's been a long tomorrow)?

@netfinity :
would this be okay (i did this before the prev posts about ZLIB_WINAPI) - using the 0.47a proj files? i get warnings from SF's files but i know the int conversions are okay... thanks for the 1.0b update.

[netfinity]

moloko+, on May 6 2006, 07:56 AM, said:

@netfinity :
would this be okay (i did this before the prev posts about ZLIB_WINAPI) - using the 0.47a proj files? i get warnings from SF's files but i know the int conversions are okay... thanks for the 1.0b update.

Yes, as long as you add the new .cpp files to the project it should work. The reason why I use the ZLIB_WINAPI stuff is that I got some major linking problems when I didn't compile the libraries with this flag. It's an ancient remnant that you can leave out if you can build the official client, you should also be able to build ESE with the same project file if you add the new files to it.

[netfinity]

moloko+, on May 6 2006, 01:11 AM, said:

hi netfinity,

SiRoB has posted a fix for ReadBlockFromThread here:

Topic: [fix] Filtered Block Request
http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=104788

cheers.

Thanks, I'm waiting for a new Morph XT mod to be ready. Then I can compare and get a better grip of what the fix is all about.

[EDIT]I'd just saw there is a new Morph mod out, so I will take a look at it.[/EDIT]

This post has been edited by netfinity: 06 May 2006 - 01:38 PM

[Andu]

netfinity that's just a BETA yet. So the final won't be far off. The question is if the slotfocus bug is something that has influence on your code.

I personally would recommend waiting till the final is out since then you can be sure that there is no last minute fix that you have to adopt later on.

[SiRoB]

Hi netfinity, you should only change the thing arround multiple hash trouble.
Only Check:
!m_nTotalBufferData
CSingleLock sLock1(&(theApp.hashing_mut), TRUE);

[moloko+]

netfinity, on May 6 2006, 10:45 PM, said:

moloko+, on May 6 2006, 07:56 AM, said:

@netfinity :
would this be okay (i did this before the prev posts about ZLIB_WINAPI) - using the 0.47a proj files? i get warnings from SF's files but i know the int conversions are okay... thanks for the 1.0b update.

Yes, as long as you add the new .cpp files to the project it should work. The reason why I use the ZLIB_WINAPI stuff is that I got some major linking problems when I didn't compile the libraries with this flag. It's an ancient remnant that you can leave out if you can build the official client, you should also be able to build ESE with the same project file if you add the new files to it.

Yes, I've had success with both the Official and ESE 1.0b (+ 0.46c libs) - without ZLIB_WINAPI - with VS2003 .NET...
and with your patch (tested on XP SP1 & SP2), but now i've reverted to the simple fix by delay loading ws2_32.dll and all is well too. Thanks.

I think this guy is running VS2003 .NET in spooky mode:
http://forum.emule-p...owtopic=105369#

cheers.

[Gomez82]

moloko+, on May 6 2006, 06:56 AM, said:

hi Andu,
yeah, i'd be stuck if modders didn't post their solutions and folly here... no point in gripes anyways since we all learn bit by bit (even if i regret some of my own posts ).

its all information, which is anti personal and not owned by anyone (well you know what i mean), which is kinda the philosophy in p2p... it just sucks having the wrong info (...well embarrasing mostly)...

@Gomez82 :
i got ESE to compile on VS2003 .NET by copying the proj files from the 0.47a sources and adding SlugFiller SafeHash files to the project and a few other things (sorry can't remember)...

btw, did the compile work out (it's been a long tomorrow)?

@netfinity :
would this be okay (i did this before the prev posts about ZLIB_WINAPI) - using the 0.47a proj files? i get warnings from SF's files but i know the int conversions are okay... thanks for the 1.0b update.

hi i didn't compiled it till now, because i reinstallled my windows ... i will try now hope it work

Edit: it worked

This post has been edited by Gomez82: 08 May 2006 - 12:45 PM

[SiRoB]

Hi netfinity,
Could this be the Best Simple dynamic limit number of block resquested?

Quote

if (bytesPerRequest > EMBLOCKSIZE) {
  *count = min(bytesPerRequest/EMBLOCKSIZE, *count); //MORPH - Added by SiRoB, Enhanced DBR
  bytesPerRequest = EMBLOCKSIZE;
} else
  *count = 1; //MORPH - Added by SiRoB, Enhanced DBR

[netfinity]

@SiRoB
In most cases this is OK, but can result in more blocks being requested than you expect as the function doesn't know how many blocks that are queued.

[DavidXanatos]

Hi,
there are some bugs in the safe hash:
1. in the function void CPartFile::PartFileHashFinished(CKnownFile* result)
the part

if (GetED2KPartCount()==0 || GetHashCount()==0){ 
  	}
	else{
  	}

is completly useless dour to the was safehash handles one chunk files the first condition is always false,
and the part in the else stays alrady above the if so its duplicated

2. The safe hash is saving the file hash as 1st hash in hashlist for 1 chunk files, this causes incopatybility of the known.met file with the official clinet


David

[leexgx]

good simple mod this is still (just bringing it back to life)

[netfinity]

leexgx, on Jul 19 2006, 10:12 PM, said:

good simple mod this is still (just bringing it back to life)

Yup, it is quite good but can be even better!

I'm working on a replacement Mod for NetF and the latest test build show an insanely effective endgame. It has a little bit aggressive dropping, but so far it only improved performance and kept corruption at 0%.

My download time for each of 26 mp3's where with this special build
1 downloaded in less than 1 minute
14 downloaded in less than 2 minutes
6 downloaded in less than 3 minutes
and remaining ones in less than 10 minutes

So, it looks quite promising for the future...

/netfinity

[Syst3m Crash3r 480]

netfinity, on Jul 19 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

My download time for each of 26 mp3's where with this special build
1 downloaded in less than 1 minute
14 downloaded in less than 2 minutes
6 downloaded in less than 3 minutes
and remaining ones in less than 10 minutes

So, it looks quite promising for the future...

/netfinity

How do you achive these results!?!

[Stulle]

Syst3m Crash3r 480, on Jul 20 2006, 03:43 PM, said:

netfinity, on Jul 19 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

My download time for each of 26 mp3's where with this special build
1 downloaded in less than 1 minute
14 downloaded in less than 2 minutes
6 downloaded in less than 3 minutes
and remaining ones in less than 10 minutes

So, it looks quite promising for the future...

/netfinity

How do you achive these results!?!

asking for friendupload... damn it, can't you read¿ "an insanely effective endgame"