[strip]

pepe0008, on Sep 26 2006, 06:17 PM, said:

Do you, Lugdunum, see extending the protocol to support some kind of "virtual elink" possible, so that it would group together several files in one single edonkey link?

What advantadge would that have over emulecollection?

Edit: Oops! Too late.

This post has been edited by strip: 26 September 2006 - 08:42 PM

[Firnus]

pepe0008, on Sep 26 2006, 08:31 PM, said:

EvolutionCrazy, on Sep 26 2006, 10:25 PM, said:

pepe0008 collections are there to share multiple files with just one link

What "collections"? I've never heard of them.

Quote

# Collections: you can create, view and use collections for eMule, to bundle a number of files virtually together and use this to define a set of files. A set that can be signed to ensure the origin.

Special files : you can share it in eMule, share it on http server, or make a php-program to construct automaticly > (see here for an example)

[pepe0008]

strip, on Sep 26 2006, 10:41 PM, said:

pepe0008, on Sep 26 2006, 06:17 PM, said:

Do you, Lugdunum, see extending the protocol to support some kind of "virtual elink" possible, so that it would group together several files in one single edonkey link?

What advantadge would that have over emulecollection?

Alright, I see now what an "emulecollection" is, essentially a little binary file containing together the names and hashes of several files shared in the edonkey network. I am using aMule 2.1.3 and there is no support of "emulecollections" yet.

Yes, this addresses the problem I mentioned, but it does it at the client/application level, not at the protocol level... Hmm, kind of an ugly hack, but it could work...

Still, could a more transparent solution at the protocol level be better? (I don't see many people using "emulecollection"s, but I see a lot of multi-file torrents around...)

[JAW]

So...
what is the disadvantage of the client-side implementation?
You can search for emulecollections via emule's integrated search. Which makes them superior to torrents. Other than that they offer the same possibilities: They can be published on a website, sent by email or can be made public any other way.

[Firnus]

JAW, on Sep 26 2006, 10:33 PM, said:

what is the disadvantage of the client-side implementation?

For exemple amule doesn't implement collection. Then Linux user don't use linux collection.

But pepe0008: bittorent need an extra files to have 'several files shared in one' : the .torrent files.

ed2k work without extra files .
I don't know if it's possible to integrate 'several files shared in one' in the protocol ... in bittorent , i don't think it's in the protocol.

[PacoBell]

Firnus, on Sep 27 2006, 07:38 AM, said:

For exemple amule doesn't implement collection.

Although, I'm sure it's in the works.

Quote

in bittorent , i don't think it's in the protocol.

Correct, it's bencoded into the .torrent file.

[Firnus]

PacoBell, on Sep 27 2006, 10:27 PM, said:

Firnus, on Sep 27 2006, 07:38 AM, said:

For exemple amule doesn't implement collection.

Although, I'm sure it's in the works.

I'm sure too

aMule is great !!!! and amule dev is great too !

[edit abd ->and]

This post has been edited by Firnus: 28 September 2006 - 07:57 AM

[beetho]

hello there are or true servants in funcionamiendo of razorback or nongreetings

[cafebean]

Is Razorback back?
http://www.razorback2.com


http://forum.razorba...showtopic=12437
translated by google

Quote

After more than five months of absence, we return finally, but seriously cut down by our technical installations, our 2 waiters eDonkey and part of our news.

During this absence, we set up our strategy of defense and launched the first procedures, reason for which we have to compel us to stop any communication.

Five months without you to announce our situation and without calling some with the support of the community were not a sinecure. We thus decided to publish a first news bulletin. Others will follow news progressively.

The safeguards of our sites being on the seized waiters and not having been able to be restored to us, we put on line the version of December 23, 2005.

To see the continuation:
http://www.razorback...++partiellement

Is it too good to be true?

[kobolds]

cafebean, on Oct 21 2006, 12:20 PM, said:

Is Razorback back?
http://www.razorback2.com


http://forum.razorba...showtopic=12437
translated by google

Quote

After more than five months of absence, we return finally, but seriously cut down by our technical installations, our 2 waiters eDonkey and part of our news.

During this absence, we set up our strategy of defense and launched the first procedures, reason for which we have to compel us to stop any communication.

Five months without you to announce our situation and without calling some with the support of the community were not a sinecure. We thus decided to publish a first news bulletin. Others will follow news progressively.

The safeguards of our sites being on the seized waiters and not having been able to be restored to us, we put on line the version of December 23, 2005.

To see the continuation:
http://www.razorback...++partiellement

Is it too good to be true?

better wait for awhile and see before join in.

[qm2003]

I just love auto-translation.


Until there is an "official" and verified announcement from lugdunummaster, those servers will not get into my list.

You can call me paranoid, if you want to.

This post has been edited by qm2003: 21 October 2006 - 03:17 PM

[Firnus]

cafebean, on Oct 21 2006, 04:20 AM, said:

Is Razorback back?

Is it too good to be true?

Only the WebSite and the forum

[jamei]

Razorback back for a moment ,like always :|

[eMule-Star]

jamei, on Nov 5 2006, 02:31 PM, said:

Razorback back for a moment ,like always :|

What do you mean ?
The eD2k Razorback Servers are NOT online since February 2006, they probably won't be online until a long time ...

[Semm]

Hm, I also noticed 'Cheztoff' vanished some time ago and is almost dead by now.
Seems like only Donkeyservers (the real one's of course) and KAD are left.

This post has been edited by Semm: 05 November 2006 - 02:52 PM

[EvolutionCrazy]

Firnus, on Oct 24 2006, 12:19 PM, said:

cafebean, on Oct 21 2006, 04:20 AM, said:

Is Razorback back?

Is it too good to be true?

Only the WebSite and the forum

AFAIK they have some upload servers running in Netherlands (LeaseWeb)

You can see them from time to time uploading jamendo.com releases

This post has been edited by EvolutionCrazy: 05 November 2006 - 06:34 PM

[m8h]

eMule-Star, on Nov 5 2006, 03:39 PM, said:

jamei, on Nov 5 2006, 02:31 PM, said:

Razorback back for a moment ,like always :|

What do you mean ?
The eD2k Razorback Servers are NOT online since February 2006, they probably won't be online until a long time ...

jamei is a spammer , practically none of he's posts make any sense. He's signature contains a link to a web site and the only purpose of he's posts is creating more links to he's (most likely a scam) site.
I already reported about one of he's other posts. Ignore him and don't click on any of he's links.

This post has been edited by m8h: 05 November 2006 - 06:52 PM

[Firnus]

Semm, on Nov 5 2006, 03:51 PM, said:

Hm, I also noticed 'Cheztoff' vanished some time ago and is almost dead by now.
Seems like only Donkeyservers (the real one's of course) and KAD are left.

cheztoff come back (ed2k server) but in a new IP !

[aachen]

BigBang server arent fakes and have a great max user limit, maybe the future os ed2k server is BB

[PacoBell]

aachen, on Nov 8 2006, 10:46 AM, said:

maybe the future os ed2k server is BB

If by "os" you mean "open source", would you kindly explain why you believe this to be so?