[DJ_MELERIX]

Yes

72.51.37.107 ButsyPirates
72.51.35.78 Ararat Sar
72.51.38.139 >> File Factory <<

Are fake servers

OrgName:    ServerBeach
OrgID:      SERVER-17
Address:    5150 Broadway #620
Address:    X
City:       San Antonio
StateProv:  TX
PostalCode: 78209
Country:    US

NetRange:   72.51.32.0 - 72.51.47.255
CIDR:       20
NetName:    PEER1-SERVERBEACH-06
NetHandle:  NET-72-51-32-0-1
Parent:     NET-72-51-0-0-1
NetType:    Reallocated
Comment:    
RegDate:    2006-03-23
Updated:    2006-03-23

TechHandle: HOSTM325-ARIN
TechName:   Hostmaster 
TechPhone:  +1-210-225-4725
TechEmail:  hostmaster@serverbeach.com

OrgTechHandle: ZZ4092-ARIN
OrgTechName:   ipadmin 
OrgTechPhone:  +1-210-225-4725
OrgTechEmail:  ipadmin@serverbeach.com

This post has been edited by DJ_MELERIX: 10 April 2006 - 02:28 AM

[leuk_he]

Meuh6879, on Apr 9 2006, 03:48 PM, said:

that's because it's a "correct adressed range"...you can complain at bluestack forum for the fake server.

The ipfilter in this thread doesn't include a list of fake server

Should not fake servers always be part of level1 filter? (maybe i shoudl ask in the brluetack forums, but from most post there i have no idea yet what they are talking about. )

[Firnus]

leuk_he, on Apr 10 2006, 12:46 PM, said:

Should not fake servers always be part of level1 filter? (maybe i shoudl ask in the brluetack forums, but from most post there i have no idea yet what they are talking about. )

I think too fake server is included in level1

[Rick164]

Starting the upload process , will update the txt in 5/6 hours.

/edit:

The host is currently down for maintenance(nice timing ) , i expect them back soon.
But it could take a little longer to update this time.

This post has been edited by Rick164: 12 April 2006 - 02:25 PM

[Rick164]

Hehe, Murphy does have a point :

Anything that can go wrong will go wrong, and at the worst possible time.

/edit:

Completed

This post has been edited by Rick164: 13 April 2006 - 02:54 PM

[DJ_MELERIX]

New fake servers:

This post has been edited by DJ_MELERIX: 21 April 2006 - 06:16 AM

[Andrey23]

This is а list of fake servers (in PeerGuardian format) - http://tgo99.free.fr/fakeservers.txt
It update daily.

[lordpake]

There is a small thread in the support forums about new batch of what looks like fake servers not included in ipfilter. Would it be possible to have them investigated/included in the next update?

the thread, right here

[Meuh6879]

So, what do you think...?
Must i do include a new list to the fake servers ?

In this case, witch list are updated "correctly" ? The breizh Punisher list ?

http://forum.emule-p...pic=100907&st=0

This post has been edited by Meuh6879: 22 April 2006 - 01:54 PM

[Meuh6879]

Quote

[BG] = Bogon with "Invalid" and "Not declared" and "Not used" description
[L1] = Level1 from BISS.
[L2] = Level2 from BISS.
[M$] = Microsoft range from BISS.
[HJ] = Hijacked range from BISS.
[LN] = Lan range.
[FK] = Fakes Servers reported on eMule-Project.



BOGON
Invalid-->60
Not declared-->70
Not used-->80

BISS
M$-->90
Hijacked-->100
Fake-->105
Level1-->110
Level2-->120

LAN (by default, excluded manually by erasing)
Lan-->160

It's ok ? Or Fake Server can have a 122...number

This post has been edited by Meuh6879: 23 April 2006 - 01:02 AM

[Frankie4]

Hi i don't know if this is the right topic to post in, but i like to known your opinion about this filtering method http://www.emulesecurity.net/

Sorry for my english, i've some problems with my native language too

[Meuh6879]

I can't open the eMule logo or the main title...so, this site are not very complain about W3C.

[leuk_he]

Meuh6879, on Apr 23 2006, 03:01 AM, said:

It's ok ? Or Fake Server can have a 122...number 

No fake servers are more important than l1 105 is a good idea.

Not by the way that in the official emule server are filteredsubotimal. If you already have them you just get a lowid (or a fake highid) from them because the incoming connection, but the outgoing connection is not fitlered.

Bluesonic boy alrady posted a fix for this in code snippits.

[mirus86]

Meuh6879, on Apr 23 2006, 12:48 PM, said:

I can't open the eMule logo or the main title...so, this site are not very complain about W3C.       

Hi i have make a direct link with google traslate, because the site is in italian.
http://translate.goo...Flanguage_tools

[Meuh6879]

Firnus, on Apr 11 2006, 12:54 PM, said:

leuk_he, on Apr 10 2006, 12:46 PM, said:

Should not fake servers always be part of level1 filter? (maybe i shoudl ask in the brluetack forums, but from most post there i have no idea yet what they are talking about. )

I think too fake server is included in level1

Yes is the answer

[Meuh6879]

Temporary Changelog, build in progress

Quote

#
#
#-0---(main title)---Ipfilter v105 (2006-04-23).
#>> http://forum.emule-p...showtopic=19247
#>> Builded to be used with eMule & a private ISP. Fight the Futur.
#>> Normally updated every 15 days maximum.
#
#-1---(3 lists)------BOGON list (2006-04-23).
#>> http://completewhois...ogons/index.htm
#>> [BG]Invalid IPv4: Bogon list.
#  http://completewhois...etrange-all.txt
#>> [BG]Not Declared IPv4: Not in BGP database.
#  http://completewhois...etrange-all.txt
#>> [BG]Not Used IPv4: Allocated in BGP database but not used.
#  http://completewhois...etrange-all.txt
#>> Cloned Ranges are removed between this lists before BLM process with a spreadsheet.
#
#-2---(4 lists)------Bluetack (BISS) Personal-Build of IPFilter (2006-04-23).
#>> Includes: Level1[L1], Hijacked[HJ], Level2[L2], M$[M$].
#>> Many correction (~231 lines) on cosmetic input...all lines readables are includes.
#>> http://www.bluetack....=Blacklists+FAQ
#>> http://www.bluetack.co.uk/config
#
#-3---(1 list)-------Fakes Server List from eMule-Project (2006-04-23).
#>> http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=100907
#>> Fake server list[FK] update by ElChele from the users feedbacks in eMule-Project Forum.
#
#-4---(main tool)----Merged by BlockList Manager Beta 2.5.3 (2005-07-15). 2.6-BETA available !
#>> http://www.bluetack....=showpage&pid=1
#>> all the lists are imported manually (not by BLM) one by one in (a.a.a.a,b.b.b.b,000,c) format.
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v105: Merged Ranges: , Deny IP Count:  (% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v104: Merged Ranges: 21896, Deny IP Count: 2 850 410 012 (66,3% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v103: Merged Ranges: 20656, Deny IP Count: 2 856 594 330 (66,5% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v102: Merged Ranges: 19990, Deny IP Count: 2 861 049 195 (66,6% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v101: Merged Ranges: 19513, Deny IP Count: 2 877 410 175 (66,9% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v100: Merged Ranges: 19475, Deny IP Count: 2 879 067 510 (67,0% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v99 : Merged Ranges: 19634, Deny IP Count: 2 879 472 447 (67,0% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v98 : Merged Ranges: 22815, Deny IP Count: 2 884 574 505 (67,2% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v97 : Merged Ranges:  614, Deny IP Count: 2 880 674 840 (67,1% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v96 : Merged Ranges: 19425, Deny IP Count: 2 889 692 160 (67,3% of IPv4).
#>> Statistics of IPFilter v95 : Merged Ranges: 14849, Deny IP Count: 3 187 095 079 (74,2% of IPv4).
#>> Please, feedback to emule-project or Bluetack forum (links are on top, section -0- and -3-).
#
#-5---(warning !)----If you uses this ipfilter, you will know this:
#>> 10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255, 127.0.0.0-127.255.255.255,
#  172.16.0.0-172.31.255.255 and 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255 are not filtered.
#  It's the LanCast[LN] feature of eMule.
#>> "MultiCast" ranges are filtered.
#>> "Test Port" is filtered. It's a feature of eMule.
#>> Somes ED2K servers will be filtered when you update the ED2K server list.
#>> This IPFilter would be not used with a firewall...some many web site will be filtered.
#>> You can adjust the level of IPFilter.dat in eMule (default: all numbers before 127 are filtered)
#    60 = [BG] = Invalid.
#    70 = [BG] = Not declared.
#    80 = [BG] = Not used.
#    90 = [M$] = Microsoft.
#  100 = [HJ] = Hijacked.
#  105 = [FK] = Fake Server.
#  110 = [L1] = Level1.
#  120 = [L2] = Level2.
#  160 = [LN] = Lan range.
#  Example: if you wants filtered all except LN & L1 & L2, you must set 108.
#  -------- if you wants filtered only BG, you must set 85.
#            more you decreases level in eMule, more the security of IPFilter decrease.
#            http://forum.emule-p...showtopic=10128
#            http://forum.emule-p...ndpost&p=747806
#
#-6---(Add & Remove)-Changes from the original lists or Features added.
#>> 2006-02-04: 038.117 -> 038.119 have been removed (many others ranges are more detailed in this range).
#>> 2006-02-24: Idea by Mc4TuTi - Add of the [BG], [L1], etcs... to show witch list are used immediatly.
#>> 2006-02-24: Idea by leuk_he - Add of the propers levels to customize the level of the filter.
#  http://forum.emule-p...ndpost&p=720171
#>> 2006-04-23: Idea by the users - Add of a Fake server list.
#  http://forum.emule-p...ndpost&p=742271 
#
#

This post has been edited by Meuh6879: 23 April 2006 - 12:55 PM

[Meuh6879]

v105
ed2k://|file|ipfilter.v0105.zip|2110466|2A7C80A9C8D2371548B5766BB2516923|/

-Add of a server fake list witch is on the 105 level.

Note: BISS integrate the fake server range...as you can see on the top. So, on 172 entries of server fakes, only 8 server are not covered by the others lists.

[ElChele]

Great job! thanks a lot Meuh6879.
bye

[Canalla]

Downloading!! Thank you, Meuh6879.

[Gomez82]

hello,
in the ipfilter list are the ips of some german arcor users
i wondered the half day why i didn't find full sources and then i seen that the ip of a friend was blocked by my ip filter ...
hope u will delete the arcor ips from the filter
MfG gomez82