[Digitalfox]

PacoBell, on Jun 16 2008, 11:10 PM, said:

You know, in the meantime, you can just load whatever lists you want from Bluetack and then compile your own ipfilter with their blocklist manager. It only takes a few seconds.

Hi PacoBell

I don't know if that was for me, but to be honest with you I don't do it myself because, I think it's an very important thing and I don't want to make a mistake and have an IPFilter that doesn't filter right..

Sure even this one posted by Meuh6879 may have it's problems. We all know that Anti P2P companys don't always use static IP's or they may even use Proxys, after all they also know about this kind of IPFilters.

But nonetheless it does filter a lot of crap clients and servers that pollute P2P, and I trust the work done in this IPFilter.

[DJ_MELERIX]

PeerGuardian 2, is the best solution now

http://phoenixlabs.org/pg2/

[PacoBell]

DJ_MELERIX, on Jun 19 2008, 11:50 PM, said:

PeerGuardian 2, is the best solution now

Looks like the Windows version hasn't been updated since 2005-09-19 02:23, but the Mac version's seen some action on 2008-04-20 17:34. Also, does PG2 distinguish which programs/ports the hits belong to?

EDIT: Oh, it's because they're working on PG3 now
LOL! They're using VC2008!

This post has been edited by PacoBell: 20 June 2008 - 09:02 AM

[ElChele]

PacoBell, on Jun 20 2008, 10:54 AM, said:

DJ_MELERIX, on Jun 19 2008, 11:50 PM, said:

PeerGuardian 2, is the best solution now

Looks like the Windows version hasn't been updated since 2005-09-19 02:23, but the Mac version's seen some action on 2008-04-20 17:34. Also, does PG2 distinguish which programs/ports the hits belong to?

EDIT: Oh, it's because they're working on PG3 now
LOL! They're using VC2008!

Coming Soon

BTW, http://phoenixlabs.org/

PacoBell said:

You know, in the meantime, you can just load whatever lists you want from Bluetack and then compile your own ipfilter with their blocklist manager. It only takes a few seconds.

In fact you can add FKS IPs Last update if you want.

[ElChele]

ipfilter v129, it already is here.
Download mirror.
Please share it through emule or any mirror.
Thanks in advance.
It work fine: 26/06/2008 8:54:36: 246589 IP filters loaded.
bye

[PacoBell]

w00t!

[omeringen]

Thanx...
Please update eMulepawcio mirror

This post has been edited by erdem444: 26 June 2008 - 04:35 PM

[Dick_Manitoba]

Gracias, ElChele! Thanks!

ed2k://|file|ipfilter.v0129.rar|3965505|5AEF568388D6F6EFE35CC940DA552BFC|h=GSYEVDGEJUN3
WLSV374YALIP4QQULMYV|/

This post has been edited by Dick_Manitoba: 26 June 2008 - 08:55 PM

[omeringen]

I was using v1.28 and using Peerates server list. Updated now.
They were fake servers huh ? Too bad

Quote

ed2k://|server|89.248.172.50|4500|/(filtered)Ecatel|Anti-p2p
ed2k://|server|89.248.172.54|4500|/(filtered)Ecatel|Anti-p2p
ed2k://|server|89.248.172.86|4500|/(filtered)Ecatel|Anti-p2p
ed2k://|server|89.248.172.90|4500|/(filtered)Ecatel|Anti-p2p
ed2k://|server|222.73.27.233|4500|/(filtered)CHINANET|Anti-p2p
ed2k://|server|222.73.27.235|4500|/(filtered)CHINANET|Anti-p2p

[Rick164]

Updating mirrors, should be done in 5 hours

This post has been edited by Rick164: 27 June 2008 - 03:11 PM

[NoentiendoTermsofservice]

Thanks!!

Saludos

[Digitalfox]

I use the Ipfilter at level 100, but now after reading more about the levels, what I thought was a good level ( using 100 ) seems to be a weak level of protection..

So is level 100 a good protection?

Is there a need for a higher level like 127 on a normal use of emule on a everyday use?

Thank you

[PacoBell]

Digitalfox, on Jun 28 2008, 07:52 AM, said:

Is there a need for a higher level like 127 on a normal use of emule on a everyday use?

There is nothing particularly special about that value apart from being the default eMule uses and, thus, is used as a baseline for comparison by ipfilter makers. Read this and this for more information. HTH.

[Da GuRu]

thx, ElChele !

do you have a changelog for this?


Download Mirror ipfilter v129:
http://hostex.de/1214696184

last filter releases:
http://www.hostex.de/emule/ipfilter

.daguru

[ElChele]

Using same sources includes in main post.

20080626 08:00:37:         BLM Version: 2.7.7
20080626 08:00:37:       Finished Time: 26/06/2008 8:00:37
20080626 08:00:37:    Total Lines Read: 312694
20080626 08:00:37:       Lines Ignored: 9
20080626 08:00:37:         Lines Added: 0
20080626 08:00:37:        Dupes Merged: 1308
20080626 08:00:37:       Merged Ranges: 64789
20080626 08:00:37:        Split Ranges: 0
20080626 08:00:37:   Sources Processed: 13
20080626 08:00:37:       Deny IP Count: 2.688.253.096  (out of 4.294.967.296 IP's or 62,59077%)
20080626 08:00:37:      Total IP Count: 2.688.253.096  (out of 4.294.967.296 IP's or 62,59077% !!)
20080626 08:00:37:        Process Time: 76,50 seconds.
20080626 08:00:37:       Download Time: 2,32 seconds.
20080626 08:00:37:          Total Time: 78,82 seconds.
20080626 08:00:37:         Rules Added: 246589
20080626 08:00:37:    Rules Per Second: 3223,29
20080626 08:00:37:         Error Count: 0
20080626 08:00:37: Ready.
20080626 08:03:27: Converting to eMule/cDonkey/IPFilter.dat...
20080626 08:03:46: Conversion Complete.
20080626 08:03:46: Ready.
20080626 08:10:09: Conversion output saved to C:\LA MULA\eMule\config\ipfilter.dat
20080626 08:10:09: Ready.

[moloko+]

hey guys,

I noticed that the latest v129 filter has the "level" set to 0 on all the filters...

[guijarrelson]

Thanks for this new release

Greets!

[Digitalfox]

moloko+, on Jun 29 2008, 02:50 PM, said:

hey guys,

I noticed that the latest v129 filter has the "level" set to 0 on all the filters...

Yes, after I read your post it seems so..

But correct me if I'm wrong, if you use level 100 it will block all of them, so unless you wanted to choose what to block, this version of ipfilter will block everything and will do job right

I guess maybe it wasn't done the same way ( less free time from the author to add levels ) or the author isn't the same, but I'm sure there's people on this board who know this stuff better than me

This post has been edited by Digitalfox: 29 June 2008 - 11:52 PM

[moloko+]

Digitalfox, on Jun 30 2008, 09:51 AM, said:

moloko+, on Jun 29 2008, 02:50 PM, said:

hey guys,

I noticed that the latest v129 filter has the "level" set to 0 on all the filters...

Yes, after I read your post it seems so..

But correct me if I'm wrong, if you use level 100 it will block all of them, so unless you wanted to choose what to block, this version of ipfilter will block everything and will do job right

I guess maybe it wasn't done the same way ( less free time from the author to add levels ) or the author isn't the same, but I'm sure there's people on this board who know this stuff better than me

Yeah, not a big thing. Having them set to 0 just means that everything is blocked with no user interaction required. I did like the level idea although I never did use it... (well...)

Cheers

[Stulle]

btw, what did you base your new version on? or did you just add the new IP ranges rather randomly?