[]Axl[]

Hi to all,
i have a very fast internet connection and even if i tried some emule mods, none are able to use correctly all my uplod speed...
Which is the better emule mod for very high upload speed?
With which settings?

[Stulle]

MorphXT can handle very high speeds. I tested it on up to 10 MByte/s on a root box with slotfocus enabled and it was able to fill the bandwidth most of the time.

This post has been edited by Stulle: 09 July 2011 - 11:10 AM

[James R. Bath]

Ignore Stulle. Constantly pushing his bloated mods that are best used by experimenters who have no real interest in actually downloading or uploading files. The slotfocus in his mods, while it may initially seem to handle the speed, eventually stalls and requires restarting emule.

I'd recommend something simple with as few morphings as possible. For me, that's beba v2.63. It has a better alternative to slot control (essentially all the mods have serious bugs in their slot control, even beba). Beba provides a slot limiter and it's very stable. In your case, 12 slots with open more if needed enabled should keep both your total bandwidth and individual upload speeds very high. I can't remember whether the slot focus is enabled by default, but be sure it's disabled. It also has the advantage of the client analyzer to catch clients messing with your uploads far better than morph. As far as making sure speed and disk throttling stay where you like it, it provides a setting tweak to the file buffer size. Depending on how many files you share and the memory available, you can increase this to keep frequently requested parts and files in memory.

[Meuh6879]

technicaly, mores clients on popular files are "ratio restricted" about the download speed.
so, upload speed is like 3-6ko/s in many of case (max 11-12ko/s per client slot).

upload focus work only on rare file...with member/emule that have a 2:1 ratio or on the national ground of the uploader.

for 1Mb/s upload line, i use 10 slots max and slotfocus feature (slot focus work generally for 3 slots and every 30 mins, the statistics line show me that the 10 slots are full).
regulary, i push the queue (disable slotfocus) and add 18 slots at low speed (5ko/s) to spread the chunk.

i use automatic upload speed with ping feature.
http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=153189

This post has been edited by Meuh6879: 14 August 2011 - 02:59 PM

[Stulle]

oh crap, there i was thinking you were a goner, james... finally, i might add. too soon, i know now.

anyway, while we might disagree with how usable my mods are, you are very mistaken about what i am doing. i am not pushing my mod with the above post, i am only claiming what i know to be true. at this point MorphXT is the mod best suited for high upload speeds. this follows not only personal observation but more importantly SiRoBs test he undertook a couple of years ago. he tested not just MorphXT but at least also ZZUL. ZZUL, however, proved to be superior in downloading (IIRC) but in terms of upload MorphXT had a slight advantage. i think netfinity's mods are also well suited for high upload speeds because this is where they were tested for the most part. However, both ZZUL and netfinity's mods have the major disadvantage of being outdated. on a different note, i am not claiming MorphXT's great upload performance is a result of any of my work because this is something that has been done by SiRoB for the most part. he based much of his work on zz's code and leuk_he also did some valuable contributions. anyway, i only merged the stuff.

so rather than going on a rant about things you have no idea about (high upload speed and upload performance of mods) because of people you don't like (me) you could just shut the F up and leave dead threads in piece, instead of raping the dead. the latter is called being a necrophiliac and if you really want to wear that pair of shoes you are even worse than i suspected all along. okehthxbai

[netfinity]

I agree with Stulle that MorphXT may be a good start. I haven't tried it myself but any Mod with multithreaded uploading will help when disks or CPU are coming short.

If the upload problem is purely CPU related (remember eMule do most of the heavy work in on CPU core only so it is the GHz that counts) you can try turning of protocol obfuscation, also avoid keeping the transfer window open in eMule as it consumes enourmous amount of CPU time when the data rates are high. Some mods also allow turning of data compression which is very CPU intense, even worse than the encryption.

[Stulle]

Hey mate, great to see you. How are things going? Might we be in for some new code from you?

[netfinity]

Well, I haven't been that active lately. Have been doing some optimizations and a lot of bugfixes since I seem to introduce new ones all the time.

I've done some experimenting to make Kad searching more quicker and hopefully more reliable. Then I have increased the read buffer in the hashing thread to reduce context switches and it seemed to nearly double the hashing speed when hashing files on my NAS. I might release something in a not to far future as I think I fixed all the major side effects in the code. Had a lot of problem with completing when a corruption occured after the merge with 0.50a.

I'm thinking of moving the code for compressing the upload data to the ReadBlockFromFileThread, to get more benefit from multicore CPU's.

At the moment my biggest problem is however to get all SDK's and stuff running after I made a clean install of Windows on my PC. Any cool features you're planning?

[Stulle]

Sounds great!

Well, I've been a little busy and will likely be busy with some other real life stuff in the future but I still plan do proceed with some maintenance work in the nearer future. I still got some ideas that I want to do but it's a bit of a lot work. Still, I might try to give the Opera (Browser) style Ctrl+Tab feature another shot. I find that immensely useful when working with Opera, so that should be neat. Other than that I still want to merge the eMuleSpana UPnP (like in MorphXT) with the ones in official eMule. Anyway, this is a lot of work so I really have to see when I get around that.

What's your problem with the SDKs? Are you having trouble integrating them into VS using the provided registration tool? I found out that you actually need to set localization settings to English (US) to make it work. Anyway, if you tell me what you need I can give you info on how I set up VS03 without and VS05, VS08, and VS10 with Win7 SDK.

[netfinity]

UPnP is something I would like to get working but it seems my router doesn't respond even thought UPnP is enabled. Think it has something with that I'm not using the default VLAN for my home network.

Had just a minor problem to find the WinXP SDK to get the qedit.h include file. Now everything is compiling as it should. Ran a profiler and noticed that the OnIdle handling seems to consume alot of CPU, I wonder if it has something to do with the new high performance timer introduced in 0.50a.

[Stulle]

Ah, this is something that leuk_he seemed to have noticed a long time ago. He added a change to improve performance on Wine in CemuleDlg::OnIdle (IIRC).

The thing about UPnP is that even the two official implementations don't get all Routers to work. The one in MorphXT at least gets some more and the basic layout seems to be an improvement over the one from the official eMule, so I think it is eventually worth the work.

[James R. Bath]

In conclusion, Morph a few years ago tested by someone with a personal interest and ego in Morph against some other old mods performed best. This ignores Stulle's changes and added bloat to Morph, not to mention fails because beba wasn't tested then. Can you trust a program/programmer that keeps getting bigger even after requiring another huge program to be running in addition to the basic Windows setup that beba runs great on? Can you expect it to be faster, less buggy, and less exposed to exploits and anti-p2p? No. More holes + more code bloat + more required programs running simultaneously = slower program, slower computer.

BTW, despite Stulle claiming he doesn't miss me, he's constantly checking my profile page here. I hadn't been here for months before his most recent visit to my page, yet he had visited it on July 25. I'm not sure if its his obsession to down vote all my posts or his recognition that I consistently make useful observations and recommendations that he wants to take advantage of.

Either way, stick to the facts and keep the "official" version and Morph off your machine and you will make full or nearly full use of your upload bandwidth without. As a side note, beba handles sharing thousands of files. Sharing that many files is one of Stulle's many blame points when people complain about Morph's real-world performance.

This post has been edited by James R. Bath: 19 August 2011 - 05:33 AM

[Stulle]

James, if you don't have a clue why don't you just shut it? Your ignorance just shows how little idea about actual coding you have... or how little you understand when reading a changelog, for the matter. BTW, since you are referring to the MorphXT 12.0 issue... well, it's a 12.0 issue. Any other version will work flawlessly on an up to date Windows OS. Again, don't just assume and talk sh*t if you got no clue. You have brought nothing of value to the community so instead of insulting great coders like zz and SiRoB while ignoring the objective assessment of another valued coder (i.e. netfinity) you could at least try and direct your insults directly at me rather than the work of other people. Anyway, I have long lost hope to actually reason with you. Now I just reply your filth and hope you will writing dumb enough to get your third warning at which point I will finally be rid of you... just like all the other annoyed members of this board.

And yeah, I don't miss you but I also like to keep track of morons who spread their filth about me and my projects. Best way to do so is by checking their activity. Anyway, I do wonder why someone would bother checking his own profile all the time and then spread his findings all over the place. Might you be a bit of an egomaniac? Always checking who bothered looking out for you? On a different note, I also like to see just how low your reputation can get. Incidentally you keep being down voted whenever you post some of your filth somewhere. Ever wondered why that is?

Also, MorphXT, just like my other mods, have no problem handling idiotic numbers of shared files. I have written I do not suggest sharing idiotic numbers of files in various threads on this board and while I fully understand that you would be ignorant to smart suggesting I made always clear that it is a personal opinion.

Lastly, your way of subjective and agenda driven filth spillage about MorphXT is so obvious, it would take another moron, just like yourself, to actually consider any of your filth valid. It bears any kind of objective verification and just doubting objective tests on the basis of the tester being involved with the project is not just dumb but also childish. In fact, if SiRoB would have been that subjective, why would he bother to name another mod as a better partner for downloading? Makes no sense, does it? But so does non of your filth make actual sense.

[Meuh6879]

If i can propose something ... i use the "katana mod" with slotfocus (or not) AND custom number of slot (10 for 1Mb/s---usually 4-6 with slotfocus) AND ping upload speed official function (92-101ko/s).

[Vegan]

Anything over 150 KB/s seems to cause Extreme to fall apart and start letting everyone connect no matter how slow.

Given that lots now have faster internet, its time to fix the problems generally


I also think disabling the throttle completely is more efficient too

[shadowfaxer]

Quote

Axl[' date='09 July 2011 - 11:57 AM' timestamp='1310198253' post='1064787']
Hi to all,
i have a very fast internet connection and even if i tried some emule mods, none are able to use correctly all my uplod speed...
Which is the better emule mod for very high upload speed?
With which settings?

So if your upload speed appears to be slower than your download speed.This is usually normal, because most high-speed Internet connections, including cable modems and DSL, are asymmetric — they are designed to provide much better speed for downloading than uploading. Since most users spend much more time downloading (which includes viewing web pages or multimedia files) than they do uploading, high speed Internet providers have designed their systems to give priority to downloading. No way to get a high upload speed some times it may cause while the connection have any defects through the line or some faults with your ISP..check your speed using scanmyspeed.com

This post has been edited by shadowfaxer: 22 September 2012 - 06:54 AM