Official eMule-Board: [Searching]A Mod With Some Features - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

[Searching]A Mod With Some Features

#1 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 26 June 2010 - 12:55 PM

Hi all, i'm searching an emule mod with some features.
I currently use sharkX (and it work really well) but it have a small flaw for my setings (see 1 & 2 ), so while taz fix it, i search another mod because i swear when a client with low reputation (1, default is 100) take an upload slot.

I need these features:
- multiqueue
- clientAnalyzer / clientAnalyzer creditSystem

obiviously these features should work at same time.

There are a lot of mods here, so sorry if i ask directly here without test all mods by myself.

Thanks!

This post has been edited by pier4r: 26 June 2010 - 12:56 PM

>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#2 User is offline   James R. Bath 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 790
  • Joined: 02-August 04

Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:22 AM

The closest thing to SharkX is probably beba. I've used both recently and they have a lot of similarities in queue handling, uploading (including CA), and GUI options, plus beba throws in some useful extras. Don't expect MultiQueue and you're probably better off without it. It looks like the only mods that have MQ don't have CA, and it's clear that MQ is giving you a lot more headaches, so is best trashed.
Currently recommending and using: eMule beba 2.63
For slot control only, currently recommending: Tombstone Xtended 1.0 (or higher) if you absolutely must have slot control


Posted Image

Quote

Where there is a mule there is fuel. Where there is a stool sits a fool. - Winston Churchill

0

#3 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 05 July 2010 - 07:17 AM

another question:

did someone create a mod with publish/unpublish feature?
As "unpublished status" i mean that some files can be reachable by ed2k link with source ip, but they aren't published on Kad or server, so they aren't reachable by a search.

Now i'm looking for a mod with:
(basic emule features)
SUQWT
Multiqueue
Client Analyzer that work on multiqueue
(i found at least one mod with these features: sharkx)
and, if it is possibile, publish/unpublish feature.

This post has been edited by pier4r: 05 July 2010 - 07:17 AM

>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#4 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 05 July 2010 - 07:31 AM

"Unpublish" could be considered as some kind of leecher feature (imagine that s.o. sets all of his files to "unpublish") and thus I highly doubt that this'd be legal. <_<
0

#5 User is offline   SS1900 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3737
  • Joined: 15-November 08

Posted 05 July 2010 - 07:38 AM

you can try the , naturally the acronik mod ..but it's like the sharkx mod too !! or you can try the morphCA 1.5 ...it have CA , SUQWT and a feature like "equal chance for each files" ( i don't know if it's like the "Multiqueue" )

HTH :flowers:
0

#6 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 05 July 2010 - 12:10 PM

View PosttHeWiZaRdOfDoS, on 05 July 2010 - 09:31 AM, said:

"Unpublish" could be considered as some kind of leecher feature (imagine that s.o. sets all of his files to "unpublish") and thus I highly doubt that this'd be legal. <_<


S.O. ? Sorry i don't understand!
Anyway obiviously i don't want to unpublish all my files (moreover i can unshare all my files and it is quite the same behaviour), so i asked only for a mod with that feature (if exist).


View PostSS1900, on 05 July 2010 - 09:38 AM, said:

feature like "equal chance for each files" ( i don't know if it's like the "Multiqueue" )


multiqueue is equal chance for each file, sorry for the mess.
>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#7 User is offline   LorenzoC 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2478
  • Joined: 05-September 04

Posted 05 July 2010 - 12:39 PM

What do you want to achieve by not sharing files on ed2k or kad?

BTW, once upon a time there was the "spooky mode" feature that basically worked that way.
http://wiki.emule-we...php/Spooky_mode
It was then forbidden because Emule's general goal is to share files and then any feature that harms the sharing is bad.
0

#8 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5804
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 05 July 2010 - 12:51 PM

O_O Spooky Mode had an entirely different objective! It was created to allow more people into the network when server resources were scarce. To achieve that it would connect to a server, get some initial sources and then disconnect and be "it's own server", if you like. This, however, made it hard for remote clients to find spooky clients as sources. Eventually, it was forbidden because KAD rendered Server resources obsolete.

This post has been edited by Stulle: 05 July 2010 - 12:52 PM

I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#9 User is offline   tHeWiZaRdOfDoS 

  • Man, what a bunch of jokers...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5630
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 05 July 2010 - 01:02 PM

Basically it'll do the same: you will only be reachable DIRECTLY and to sources that already know you.
0

#10 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 05 July 2010 - 01:43 PM

View PostLorenzoC, on 05 July 2010 - 02:39 PM, said:

What do you want to achieve by not sharing files on ed2k or kad?

BTW, once upon a time there was the "spooky mode" feature that basically worked that way.
http://wiki.emule-we...php/Spooky_mode
It was then forbidden because Emule's general goal is to share files and then any feature that harms the sharing is bad.


No, it don't work as i want (anyway thanks).

My client have many files (and , i guess, a lot of clients have the same conditions) and publish all files at least one time need a lot of time for Kad, then i want to unpublish group of files by rotation (manually of course). For example: first all popular files will be set as unpublishable until less popular files will be requested more and more, and so on by my own strategy.
Sure, i can obtain the same behaviour with unshare, but i don't want to remove the files from p2p, because i enable "let see all files to anyone" and so, someone still can reach other files. With unshare the files are unreachable at all (that is worst, imo).

This post has been edited by pier4r: 05 July 2010 - 01:44 PM

>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#11 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 13 July 2010 - 03:00 PM

I found till now these mods with Multiqueue, SUQWT and Client Analyzer (i count only 0.49c versions up to 0.50a version or indipendent version):

Shark 1.8b5
MorphCA

Beba have got "probabilistic queue", how it works?

This post has been edited by pier4r: 13 July 2010 - 03:04 PM

>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#12 User is offline   SS1900 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3737
  • Joined: 15-November 08

Posted 13 July 2010 - 04:14 PM

View Postpier4r, on 13 July 2010 - 04:00 PM, said:

Beba have got "probabilistic queue", how it works?



Beba randomly chooses which clients to put in upload........ this function temporarily disables the SUQWT.

:flowers:
0

#13 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 13 July 2010 - 05:25 PM

Thanks ss1900.

was it created by slugfiller (on the code i saw only "tux" )?

This post has been edited by pier4r: 13 July 2010 - 05:26 PM

>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#14 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 14 July 2010 - 08:48 PM

Yep, it was. See the changelog for credits. :flowers:

In beba, I usually tag my modifications with "// Tux: ..." in order to understand myself what I changed where in order to do what. Keeping the original tags would cause mess as even the official eMule uses "SLUGFILLER" tags.

This post has been edited by Tuxman: 14 July 2010 - 08:49 PM

[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#15 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 14 July 2010 - 09:50 PM

View PostTuxman, on 14 July 2010 - 10:48 PM, said:

Yep, it was. See the changelog for credits. :flowers:

In beba, I usually tag my modifications with "// Tux: ..." in order to understand myself what I changed where in order to do what. Keeping the original tags would cause mess as even the official eMule uses "SLUGFILLER" tags.

oh ok! Can SVN help you?

More General, why modders don't split methods?

For example
foo(){
 original code
//pier4r first mod
 pier4r code
//<----- pier4r
 original code
// tux add
 tux code
// <----- tux
 original code
}


in
foo(){
#ifdef ORIGINAL
 originalFoo()
#elseif
 moddedFoo()
#endif
}

originalFoo(){
 original code
}

moddedFoo()
 //comments: changelog & authors
 original code
 pier4r code
 original code
 tux code
 original code
}


(it's only my code style, not a rule)

Anyway can you refer to me some "good" topics about probabilistic formula? From my brief look on the code i guess that i didn't understand really well.

Thanks!
>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#16 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 14 July 2010 - 10:07 PM

SVN should help me with what?
Splitting code is a code style, but not mine. Hmm, what kind of a formula?
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#17 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5804
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 14 July 2010 - 10:09 PM

well, sometimes we do, sometimes we don't. using preprocessor definitions is obviously a lot nicer and handier when trying to keep old functionality and such. however, it is getting an utter mess if features are closely linked together. also, in less advanced environments it would look just the same no matter if your modded code would be compiled or the original code. using comments will certainly display that. anyway, i think the major reason is that it's a matter of taste.
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

#18 User is offline   pier4r 

  • Ex falso quodlibet ; Kad is the major concept behind emule.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 31-March 09

Posted 15 July 2010 - 06:36 AM

View PostTuxman, on 15 July 2010 - 12:07 AM, said:

SVN should help me with what?
Splitting code is a code style, but not mine. Hmm, what kind of a formula?



You said that "I usually tag my modifications with "// Tux: ..." in order to understand myself what I changed where in order to do what". With SVN you can do it with revisions (and some comments at the top of the method).
Anyway i talk again about code style, is not a rule.

About formula:
fBaseValue = pow((float)(rand()+1)/(RAND_MAX+2), 1.0F/fBaseValue)*1000000;


@Stulle: of course is a matter of taste! Modifications marked by the comments aren't bad at all, you can see in one time all the code for example.

This post has been edited by pier4r: 15 July 2010 - 06:39 AM

>>>Feature Request (ICS) or SOTN, EmuleCollectionV2 >>> Emule on old hardware (intel pentium 2 or 3 - via c3 - and so on) with good OS settings and enough ram (256+ mb): great >>>user of: eMule - Xtreme - ZZUL bastard - SharX - SharkX 1.8b5 pierQR - ZZUL-Tra - ZZUL-Tra-TL - kMule - Beba

Extended signature: click.
0

#19 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2707
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 15 July 2010 - 10:04 AM

Hmm, SVN for single-user development is weird IMO. Also, reviewing SVN logs takes time compared to reading code comments. :flowers:
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#20 User is offline   Stulle 

  • [Enter Mod] Dev
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5804
  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 15 July 2010 - 10:15 AM

ah, actually it's pretty useful. helps you keeping track of what you did and how it used to be. i got Git repository for all my projects and i really would not want to miss that. anyway, just a hint, Git is a distributed file versioning system which allows you to do it all locally without any need for a remote server!
I am an emule-web.de member and fan!

[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]

No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
0

  • Member Options

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users