First of all I'd like to gratulate James R. Bath to his new avatar which precisely symbolizes a
brain fart - something which can be find in all posts of him in this (&some other) threads.
James R. Bath, on 07 July 2010 - 07:56 PM, said:
Famerlor, on 07 July 2010 - 06:20 PM, said:
James R. Bath, on 07 July 2010 - 05:49 PM, said:
Stulle, on 07 July 2010 - 04:35 PM, said:
In fact, any "MorphXT" behaving badly is a lot more likely to be a leecher because until the date you could not actually prove any code in MorphXT is bugged or otherwise bad.
So, IF client ID = MorphXT and behavior = bad, THEN client = modfaker
Basically yes (in some way).
Great, let's get it coded. I have no objection.
BS. Why should WiZ code sth. like that ? The client will get punished already for behaving badly, no need for an additional punishment for modfaking. Although it *could* be a genuine MorphXT since EVERY CLIENT may be used in a bad way (it's always the user and not the client). The other way round a "bad mod" can be used fair, too - that's the philosophy WiZ had in mind creating the CA - sth. you didn't understand until now.
So in scientific/reproducible/code terms, it's not a fake and irrelevant to this discussion because all clients, mods and official, have the same problem and are subject the same types of modification.
ARGL !! Are you so dumb or are you just making fun of us here ?!?
WHY are there more virii / trojans for Windows than for Linux or MacOS ?! YES - because it is wider spread. And no guess which mods are first targets for leecher modders to modify - the well known like i.e. MorphXT and Xtreme or the "underdogs" like i.e. Spike2Mod, beba, Katana ?
It's an excuse that applies to all and thus the results for Morph are no more biased in undetectable fake terms than any other client.
I already said it, and I repeat this sentence now for the third time since you still didn't get it:
Quote
They do NOT cancel each other out. You have no possibility to recognize how many fakes of each mods you have in your queue (i.e. 10% MorphXT fakes, 8% Xtreme fakes - different quotas lead to your whole statistic be just plain BS).
Considering the heaping mess of C&P code Morph is, other mods are actually more likely targets because they can be more easily adjusted and more quickly compiled.
You really have no f****** clue. Morph is one of the real innovative mods with many unique features. I won't list them all, but many nowadays well known features like i.e. (to name just one) FlushThread origin in the MorphXT.
Quote
WiZaRd - expert modder - did not, actually supports this topic and just doesn't want me responding to users like Stulle. Thanks to WiZaRd and this topic and my matches/logs, not you or Stulle or pp or andu, a bug in the official eMule has been reported.
He didn't ? HE DID !!
Although WiZ is really able to speak for himself, here just one quote from him from his post from the 03 July 2010 - 04:03 PM:
Quote
urge you to stop that, James... really, it's just childish and getting annyoing
Didn't you read it or just ignored it ?
Quote
pie4r - did not - did question statistical techniques regarding sampling of clients with lots of users and only relevant to 50a, 49c, other heavily used clients
Perhaps you should re-read his / her posts.
Quote
pp (pille.pallo) - modder - did not, still not sure what pp's issue was. Probably got annoyed by constant PM harassment by Stulle and needed to alleviate some stress or wanted the topic to end just get Stulle and you to STFU.
I doubt that. In fact everybody here tries to get YOU to STFU since you are just spreading your BS-/anti-Morph-BS- brain farts.
One sentence from pp you obviously didn't understand just like WiZ sentence above:
Quote
OMFG... The reason that noone follows your argumentation might be that it's one-sided, vague and lacking a common base. But that's only my sight of it.
Quote
Famerlor - modder - did so - and also claimed to put me on ignore but hear you are reading my messages and responding to them again, so your honesty and intent is questionable. Feel free to keep your claim and put me on ignore.
I never ever claimed that. I said
Quote
meaning that I wanted to leave this thread. I never said to put you on my ignore list (although that's not the worsest idea). But your childish campaign here is always really provoking an answer since such BS shouldn't go uncommented.
Following quotes from Stulle's posting:
Quote
Quote
Famerlor - modder - did so - and also claimed to put me on ignore but hear you are reading my messages and responding to them again, so your honesty and intent is questionable. Feel free to keep your claim and put me on ignore.
Right and because of that he has to be wrong. Are you even believing yourself?!
And btw since James is questioning my intent I may shortly explain my intent, since it's really simple and perhaps even understandable for James (quote from one of my own previous posts):
Quote
Nope, but I am able to think for myself. And in contrast to you (James) I am able to read eMule's code and understand how it works.
And of course because I really like the CA and dislike the way you make the Analyzer look bad by your FUD-campaign against MorphXT - which just started because you're pissed because of Stulle denying your SlotLimiter "requests".
Quote
I kindly urge *ANY* moderator to do something about this person. This spread of lies and insults from this person has disturbed the boards peace for long enough. What are you waiting for? That he provokes me or anybody else to the point even the last person who is not capable of enduring all these lies starts insulting him until you can ban this person, much rather than James? He is not contributing but only causing trouble. You should honestly do something!
100% signed.
Stulle, on 07 July 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:
LorenzoC, that would have been the way to go if you are not on a smear campaign against "modX". Unfortunately for this board I stepped James' toe and he could not cope so he started going into insane-berserk-mode and here we are.
Yes and the whole thread isn't really about "reviewing mods" and neither it is about possible bad behaviour of the MorphXT-mod.
It's just about revenge from James because of Stulle not fulfilling his SlotLimiter-feature-requests in MorphXT.
James R. Bath, on 07 July 2010 - 11:38 PM, said:
that there are more undetectable fake Morphs than other undetectable fake clients is not applicable.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO CREATE UNDETECTABLE BAD MODS OUT OF EVERY MOD.
THE WIDER SPREAD A MOD IS THE MORE IT BECOMES ATTRACTIVE TO LEECHER MODDERS.
MORPHXT = WIDE SPREAD ==> MORE MORPHXT-BASED-LEECHER-MODS
i.e. KATANA = NOT WIDE SPREAD ==> LESS KATANA-BASED-LEECHER-MODS
^^^^^^
Is that so hard to understand ?
@ moderators:
Pleeeeeease close this thread.
Spike2