[qysnn]

Quote

according to the stuff of VeryCD, the project of easyMule2 had been stalled by themselves, and will not resume in a period.
the last version of easyMule2 is about one year ago. a buggy testversion. it means nothing, said by the stuff.
so, ban or unban easyMule2 means nothing, if they don't resume this project.

it has many users. And still offer the download url.

[Stulle]

Angvil, you heard zz_fly. if you got nothing to contribute don't post here. i will ensure this for zz_fly if you insist to try your luck!

[zz0fly]

qysnn, on 02 July 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:

it has many users. And still offer the download url.

i see. i will reconsider this issue and make a decision before next version of dlp.

[Stulle]

v43 released.

This post has been edited by Stulle: 19 December 2010 - 10:40 PM

[mss73]

Congratulaitions, mules and girls!

http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=124631
http://forum.emule-p...ndpost&p=894235

43 months

[Stulle]

irony goes here, please: http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=101042

if you are dissatisfied you are free to use whatever you please but don't bitch.

[Stulle]

new version available!

[Ejack79]

Hi Stulle, I have a small question:

Why is "PBF on incompleted files" always taken as a bad feature? Does it mean someone tried to achieve an unfair boost?

I have checked in source codes but found nothing about it. I can't get it yet...

[tHeWiZaRdOfDoS]

If you use such a feature extensively, you will resort to trading instead of sharing... which is bad from the networks POV.

[Stulle]

Exactly. The same applies for the Justice CS which is also designed for trading instead of sharing... exclusively, actually. And it is in the source code, I checked it.

[once375ml]

Can DLP 44 ban this client ?

He may be a mod-faker and on my queue for weeks

This post has been edited by once375ml: 23 April 2011 - 01:32 PM

[Stulle]

Looks like a perfectly good client. MorphXT 11.3 still had a fix that caused it to send a different modstring (MorphXT 9.7) to circumvent a problem with an earlier version of MorphXT.

Certain features, however, might cause some clients to stall in the queue. So you might not advance in the queue because, for instance, other clients keep getting pushed in front of you (e.g. via PowerShare or FairPlay).

[once375ml]

Stulle, on 24 April 2011 - 01:59 AM, said:

Looks like a perfectly good client. MorphXT 11.3 still had a fix that caused it to send a different modstring (MorphXT 9.7) to circumvent a problem with an earlier version of MorphXT.

Certain features, however, might cause some clients to stall in the queue. So you might not advance in the queue because, for instance, other clients keep getting pushed in front of you (e.g. via PowerShare or FairPlay).

Does MorphXT 10.4 send the same bugy MorphXT 9.7 modstring ?

[Stulle]

Any MorphXT from the 10.x and and 11.x cycle send this.

[once375ml]

Stulle, on 24 April 2011 - 04:08 PM, said:

Any MorphXT from the 10.x and and 11.x cycle send this.

OK! My mood smooth !!

[Ejack79]

qobfxb issue:

Modstring with 'qobfxb' should be stated hard leecher, but in DLPCheckNameAndHashAndMod() a qobfxb with specific userhash is detected 'Community Userhash' and will be classified soft leecher.

	static const TCHAR refuserhash13[]= _T("CB42F563EE0EA7907395420CAC146FF5"); //From "qobfxb" multi user [DargonD] 

So refuserhash13[] and all related lines should be removed.

[Riso64Bit]

Ejack79, on 31 December 2012 - 02:37 AM, said:

qobfxb issue:

Modstring with 'qobfxb' should be stated hard leecher, but in DLPCheckNameAndHashAndMod() a qobfxb with specific userhash is detected 'Community Userhash' and will be classified soft leecher.

	static const TCHAR refuserhash13[]= _T("CB42F563EE0EA7907395420CAC146FF5"); //From "qobfxb" multi user [DargonD] 

So refuserhash13[] and all related lines should be removed.

"qobfxb" is not the modstring, is only the username.

[Ejack79]

Riso64Bit, on 04 January 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:

"qobfxb" is not the modstring, is only the username.

Oops, yes, my negligence.