[Stulle]

This is the new DLP thread I'll be maintaining.

NOTE: The official Xtreme homepage will not mirror this versions number because I do not have access to that homepage.

Here is v42. Thanks zz_fly and whoever helped you
Changes:

Quote

something something something dark side, something something something complete

Have fun.

The ScarAngel and the Mephisto mod are coded in a way they will automatically download the new version for you. If you, however, stick to the Xtreme or use any other eMule mod that uses this antileech.dll follow the link below to get the latest version of the DLP:
AntiLeech42

Regards,
Stulle

This post has been edited by Stulle: 29 June 2010 - 06:47 PM

[Digitalfox]

Quote

This is just an intermediate release that is intented not to break compatibility. A new version will be released in a couple of days.

Once again thank you for your work

But Stulle, I'm curious to understand what you mean with " intermediate release that is intented not to break compatibility ", will the new version after this one you posted, not work with Xtreme 6.1?

Thank you

[Stulle]

no no, nothing like that. wizard created this version while i created an own one myself. his aim was to enable users to defend themselves from evil chinese leecher mods. unfortunately, might an "update" from his v32 to the official (my) v32 fail due to the equal version number so wiz and i thought it would be best to release his version as the official v32 and then update that one later so anyone who used his v32 to the date will not have to update and every body else will use that one for the moment and later everyone can get back into the original development line starting v33.

hope that wasn't too confusing.

[Digitalfox]

Ok, thank you, I think I understand

[Stulle]

new DLP released.

[Digitalfox]

Stulle, on Sep 8 2008, 10:58 PM, said:

new DLP released.

Nice work all of you

[Aldebaran]

I downloaded antileech v33, but when i load it with scarangel, antileech is v31.

Thaks for the atention.

Bye!!

[Stulle]

if that is the case it has not been loaded properly. place the antiLeech.dll.new in your emule directory (the one emule.exe is in) and press "reload". if it does not work stop emule, place antiLeech.dll.new in the same directory as emule.exe, rename it to antiLeech.dll and start emule anew.

[Aldebaran]

Same result.




I tried direct link too also if the mirrors were not updated.

This post has been edited by Aldebaran: 09 September 2008 - 12:03 AM

[Digitalfox]

Aldebaran, on Sep 9 2008, 12:59 AM, said:

Same result.




I tried direct link too also if the mirrors were not updated.

Try to delete both antileech files you have on your eMule directory, and then download v33 to the directory ( it has to have the name antiLeech.dll )

Hope it helps

This post has been edited by Digitalfox: 09 September 2008 - 12:07 AM

[AUG]

Why it shows DLP31 in EMULE??

This post has been edited by AUG: 09 September 2008 - 02:20 AM

[mss73]

Any method = Same result
31


but... I guess - this is new message in Lecher-message window?

09.09.2008 8:47:17: unban - Client 10400563@77.247.178.244 (200.140.169.171) '[DreaMule]Usuario [qyS9M] «DreaMule 3.2»' (eMule v0.49a [DreaMule 3.2],None/OnUploadQueue/None)

This post has been edited by mss73: 09 September 2008 - 05:05 AM

[tHeWiZaRdOfDoS]

Stulle, did you use "my" v32 .dll to create this one? (I think so... then, credits are due...)
Some notes:

• "VMULE 2007" is never sent as a clientversion but as a modstring, I'd check for VMULE
  
• same goes for "Goop.co.il" - check for co.il as modstring is sufficient
  
• same goes for "L!()Netw0rk"
  
• I suggest separating the modversion and clientversion checks
  
• I think "futuremod" should be "futuremods"

[Stulle]

wizard, like we discussed in our PMs I published your v32 a while ago giving proper credits which have now been removed due to the new version and the fact you did not directly contribute to that one. however, credits were given at the right time. you just have missed the release and thus the corresponding post.

as for your suggestions, thanks. the first three are of course right. i trusted a bit too much in zz_fly there... speration is a possibility but then, if i use different functions i will need to change the code within the mod and thus loose backward compatibility. other scenario would be to seperate it within the function but this does not bring a real benefit either. and no, both seem to be right. please enter the URL in your browser. i suppose JvA found out they changed it a bit by now.

EDIT: See here: http://forum.emule-p...s...st&p=974918

@ rest: really sorry, i grabbed the wrong file for uploading. please redownload. btw, fixed the errors wiz mentioned.

This post has been edited by Stulle: 09 September 2008 - 08:28 AM

[Avi-3k]

@Wiz
if you block "co.il", you might block legit mods (maybe not now but in the future...)
just block "goop", it's the site's name for ages, they most likely won't change it anytime soon.

Avi3k

[taz-me]

Avi-3k, on Sep 9 2008, 11:31 AM, said:

@Wiz
if you block "co.il", you might block legit mods (maybe not now but in the future...)
just block "goop", it's the site's name for ages, they most likely won't change it anytime soon.

Avi3k

I'm failing to see why someone will want to add common sufix (.com/.net/.co.XX/...) within modstr - however whatever ...

While at it, few hacked AJs are missing (binary edited AppeleJuice versions) that are "popular" among Israeli leechers :

L"T1N 8OOSTER"
L"T L N B O O S T"
L"T~L~N BOO$T"

perhaps there some more alike ...

BTW: there are some new non leecher Israeli communities (yes they do exist - although they are an extinct race ) craving for localized versions of official mods

[JvA]

tHeWiZaRdOfDoS, on Sep 9 2008, 08:02 AM, said:

• I think "futuremod" should be "futuremods"

i saw some clients with these nicknames using a aj-mod, and its an url too. i think they changed it by hand but it's not a fault to ban them too. its a url to their site and a nick used by aj-users.

[Aldebaran]

Thanks, now work properly v33.


Bye!!

[Dian Lee]

hoho~ always in the need
thx for update

[tHeWiZaRdOfDoS]

Stulle, on Sep 9 2008, 09:59 AM, said:

wizard, like we discussed in our PMs I published your v32 a while ago giving proper credits which have now been removed due to the new version and the fact you did not directly contribute to that one. however, credits were given at the right time. you just have missed the release and thus the corresponding post.

Didn't see that, indeed, alrighty then...

Quote

as for your suggestions, thanks. the first three are of course right. i trusted a bit too much in zz_fly there... speration is a possibility but then, if i use different functions i will need to change the code within the mod and thus loose backward compatibility. other scenario would be to seperate it within the function but this does not bring a real benefit either. and no, both seem to be right. please enter the URL in your browser. i suppose JvA found out they changed it a bit by now.

I meant separating the 2 lists thus avoiding mixing "clientversions" with "modversions" and getting a better overview.
If they changed the string, fine... I'd still keep the old one, though...