Analyzzul Mod ZZUL & Client Analyzer ... very, very bad code :)
#41
Posted 18 May 2008 - 03:22 PM
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
#42
Posted 19 May 2008 - 09:34 AM
Tuxman, on May 18 2008, 05:22 PM, said:
URL escape characters
Is it normal for this Client Analyzer to ban 32 out of 73 clients on my queue? This is the first time I use a client with this modification so I don't know, maybe it's totally normal, maybe not.
This post has been edited by Quezl: 19 May 2008 - 09:48 AM
#43
Posted 19 May 2008 - 10:04 AM
Quezl, on May 19 2008, 11:34 AM, said:
Very strange... because the analyzer doesn't ban anyone!
#44
Posted 19 May 2008 - 10:04 AM
Tuxman, on May 16 2008, 01:45 PM, said:
Is there anything you can't live without in this mod?
Well, after trying many various mods in search for an ultimate one i discovered many various useful features that never was combined together in one user-friendly and not heavy-weight modification... So i'm just trying to fulfill my dream of an 'ultimate' mod here
This post has been edited by aSceT: 19 May 2008 - 10:04 AM
#45
Posted 19 May 2008 - 11:51 AM
tHeWiZaRdOfDoS, on May 19 2008, 12:04 PM, said:
Hm, my bad. I believe you that. Looking into the verbose log, the only messages that are related to the bans are these:
Kad: Request flood detected for opcode 0x43 (0x43) from IP 207.171.62.32 - Droping packets with this opcode Kad: Massive request flood detected for opcode 0x43 (0x43) from IP 207.171.62.13 - Banning IP Client UDP socket: prot=0xe4 opcode=0x4b sizeaftercrypt=164 realsize=164 ***NOTE: Received unrequested response packet, size (162) in Kademlia::CKademliaUDPListener::Process_KADEMLIA2_PUBLISH_RES: 207.171.62.14:18369 Client UDP socket: prot=0xe4 opcode=0x19 sizeaftercrypt=187 realsize=187 ***NOTE: Received unrequested response packet, size (185) in Kademlia::CKademliaUDPListener::Process_KADEMLIA2_HELLO_RES: 72.172.92.44:25905
All of them come from two subranges:
207.171.62.xxx and 72.172.92.xxx
It doesn't seem to be a bug in the mod at all, but some sort of flood attack on KAD from some anti-P2P people.
This post has been edited by Quezl: 19 May 2008 - 11:57 AM
#46
Posted 19 May 2008 - 12:22 PM
#47
Posted 19 May 2008 - 12:30 PM
aSceT, on May 19 2008, 12:04 PM, said:
This is actually not the intention of the AnalyZZUL.
Maybe it's a chance for you to find out what's actually important.
edit:
I think banning is the right solution this time...
This post has been edited by Tuxman: 19 May 2008 - 12:32 PM
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
#48
Posted 19 May 2008 - 05:21 PM
Analyzzul was probably not meant to become a new super-releaser-mod (at least not for now), but merely just ZZUL + one specific anti-leeching protection.
Anyway, if it's only this single feature that you really want and don't like other mods that have it because of their many more features, then maybe try to patch Analyzzul yourself... get Visual Studio, the library pack and give it a try. The hardest part is to get the offical/mod source to compile in the first place with a newer version of Visual Studio. But be aware that in case of phpBB-style forum links it's not done with adding just that code snippet posted above... you also have to edit the resource file and add a tick box in the appropiate dialog and as I already said the above code will probably not escape "[" and "]" and thus break the phpBB forum post in case the file name contains these characters. If you want working code that doesn't break forum posts, look at the MorphXT client's source.
#49
Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:06 PM
Now the question is: will you consider them as useful on not
#50
Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:11 PM
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
#51
Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:36 PM
There are only very few things you can actually improve/tweak.
The ZZUL mod covers already almost every useful/needed feature for releasing.
(releasing doens't need any exotic CS, country flags, etc, releasing is just about uploading files)
This post has been edited by LorenzoC: 19 May 2008 - 08:38 PM
#52
Posted 20 May 2008 - 02:39 AM
Tuxman said:
Did i said something about "blinking lights"? As i said before: only something really useful that will work embedded, without user interaction (such as kad autoupdate) and i didn't said anything bout graphic or GUI enchantments...
This post has been edited by aSceT: 20 May 2008 - 02:45 AM
#53
Posted 20 May 2008 - 04:42 AM
So which feature you actually need doesn't require any "GUI enhancements"?
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
#54
Posted 20 May 2008 - 05:45 AM
aSceT, on May 19 2008, 10:06 PM, said:
Now the question is: will you consider them as useful on not
OT: me would willingly apply
#55
Posted 20 May 2008 - 02:52 PM
I've tried NextEMF mod that has got the CA and the AnalyZZUL with the CA. I noticed that NextEMF gives 0 rating to "AppleJxxx" mods, of course those with the username or modstring while AnalyZZUL gives rating 100, it seems it doens't care of them.
Just for curiosity, what is the difference?
#56
Posted 20 May 2008 - 03:25 PM
(I don't know its feature list too well...)
But the purpose of the Analyzer is IMHO to get away from those string-based punishing lists...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
#57
Posted 20 May 2008 - 03:32 PM
Yes I know the purpose of the CA yet the curiosity about two different behaviours remains.
This post has been edited by LorenzoC: 20 May 2008 - 03:32 PM
#58
Posted 20 May 2008 - 04:41 PM
3451 //>>> WiZaRd::More GPLEvilDoers //these clients CAN IMPOSSIBLY be used as "good" mods - thus they do not deserve a single byte - very sad... //personally, I'd like to send a message to those users to notify them because most do not know what they do //but this could be considered spam... :( #define MISC_GPL_CHECKS \ || strBuffer.Find(L"APPLEJUICE") != -1 \ || strBuffer.Find(L"RC-ATLANTIS") != -1 \ || strBuffer.Find(L"SUNPOWER") != -1 \ || strBuffer.Find(L"ROCKFORCE") != -1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PC 1:
22" TFT LG LW226,Intel CoreDuo E8400@3,2GHZ,Abit P35 Pro,4096 MB DDR2 Ram MDT 5-5-5-12,1x 500GB Samsung HD501LJ SATA2,XFX Nvidia Geforce 8800GTS 320MB,Creative Xifi Music,NEC DVD-RW 3540A - FW 1WB Liggy,Optiarc DVD-RW 7173A- FW 1-M1 Liggy,Windows Vista Ultimate 64Bit SP1 - Dualboot - Mandriva 2008.1 Spring Linux
Laptop:
Intel Pentium M 1,83 GHZ,2GB Ram DDR400,160GB HDD Seagate,Radeon 9700 SE 128MB,Windows Vista Business 32Bit SP1 - Dualboot - openSuse 10.3 - Dualboot
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#59
Posted 20 May 2008 - 04:54 PM
This post has been edited by LorenzoC: 20 May 2008 - 04:54 PM
#60
Posted 20 May 2008 - 07:14 PM
LorenzoC, on May 14 2008, 09:58 PM, said:
its here, just disable CS (i just thought)