Official eMule-Board: Latest Version: Zzul 20090222-2320 (emule 0.49c) - Official eMule-Board

Jump to content


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Latest Version: Zzul 20090222-2320 (emule 0.49c) First version based on 0.49c

#1 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Post icon  Posted 22 February 2009 - 11:14 PM

This is just SlotFocus + Powershare + some other small stuff that's always been in ZZUL but isn't in official.

You may want to check the replies to this post to see if this version is stable before you decide to use it. If you've tried it, please report how it works for you.

New in this version:

Changelog said:

  • First version based on 0.49c


Below are the ed2k links for downloading. Copy the ed2k links, then go to the transfer tab in eMule, rightclick in the downloads area, and select "paste ed2k links".

Please link to this thread instead of direct linking to the archives for the first few weeks, so users get the chance to read the comments in this thread. Also, please powershare if you can.

ed2k link for exe:
ed2k://|file|eMule_0.49c_ZZUL_20090222-2320.zip|2465344|5375A5E9B44AE854EB0E7D6F74BC5753|/


ed2k link for source code:
ed2k://|file|eMule_0.49c_ZZUL_20090222-2320_source.zip|675655|A93E7FA659F295B28A6C912092D53673|/


To be updated when I get the time:

You can build the ZZUL source by following the description here: http://forum.emule-p...howtopic=138165

/zz B)
ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#2 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Posted 22 February 2009 - 11:15 PM

Please note that this was a quickie-merge, and I may have lost some changes, or messed it up in other ways. I'd appreciate if someone would check through the diff compared to the 0.49b version diff and let me know if I missed any parts.

/zz B)
ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#3 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Posted 22 February 2009 - 11:47 PM

I built this without the wmvcore, and the source reflects that (vc71 project and emule_site_config.h).

This means that feature is also missing in the binary.

/zz B)
ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#4 User is offline   MadlyMad 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,745
  • Joined: 29-October 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 12:48 AM

Hi zz

Thanks a lot for being so quick and efficient.
Updated and running,
I'll let you know if I see some kind of weird behavior or something.


What kind of feature(s) is touched by the missing files ?


Cheers ! :beer:

This post has been edited by MadlyMad: 23 February 2009 - 12:48 AM


The extreme limit of wisdom, that is what the public calls madness.
0

#5 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 12:56 AM

I'm guessing it's the Windows Mediaplayer files features and the DRM warnings. Haven't had the time to download and install the WMP SDK as outlined in the emule_site_config.h.

/zz B)
ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#6 User is offline   MadlyMad 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,745
  • Joined: 29-October 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:10 AM

Ok so it's really not important (not for me at least :angelnot: )


The files priorities have changed IIRC, right ? I guess it's normal (where it's a bit less logical, maybe =) )
And I can't find the unsharing feature for now, I guess I am blind or something.

Yep : was blind, see it but can't use it ("blanked" feature), don't know yet how to enable it

This post has been edited by MadlyMad: 23 February 2009 - 01:18 AM


The extreme limit of wisdom, that is what the public calls madness.
0

#7 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:18 AM

I'm not aware of file priorities changing. Can you describe what you mean?

/zz B)
ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#8 User is offline   MadlyMad 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,745
  • Joined: 29-October 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:22 AM

I just meant the order of appearance,

Posted Image


IIRC on 0.49b it was reverse
Edit : well, maybe I dreamt (sorry), in my langage it sounds me more friendly now ^^
but as you can see on the pics, the Unshare feature is grey (don't know why yet).

This post has been edited by MadlyMad: 23 February 2009 - 01:47 AM


The extreme limit of wisdom, that is what the public calls madness.
0

#9 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 02:02 AM

I don't think the order was changed, but I would have to start the old version to really make sure. :)

I think there are some reasons to not allow a file to be unshared, like if it's in the incoming directory, or still being uploaded. I tried a random shared file just now, and that menu option was not grayed out.

/zz B)

This post has been edited by zz: 23 February 2009 - 02:11 AM

ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#10 User is offline   MadlyMad 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,745
  • Joined: 29-October 02

Posted 23 February 2009 - 03:27 AM

looks like you're right about at least the incoming folders

weird, can't understand the reason for this. Will ask in support Forum, thanks.
edit : answer in changelog, my bad. :xkipsealed:

This post has been edited by MadlyMad: 23 February 2009 - 03:33 AM


The extreme limit of wisdom, that is what the public calls madness.
0

#11 User is offline   dev84 

  • Splendid Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 26-May 06

Posted 27 February 2009 - 01:05 AM

Thx
...like always... MOD
:)
áá
0

#12 User is offline   NksTV 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 62
  • Joined: 19-August 05

Posted 04 March 2009 - 05:28 AM

first version, is there likely to be a second? or was this quick one similar to the last on based on 0.49b feature wise?
0

#13 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,608
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:48 AM

It's not impossible that it is the first 0.49c based ZZUL mod and there will be a second.
However it probably doesn't refer to it being the first 0.49c mod at all.

:flowers:
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#14 User is offline   MadlyMad 

  • Golden eMule
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,745
  • Joined: 29-October 02

Posted 06 March 2009 - 10:35 AM

Once I got multiple successive crashes, but I bet it was a windows temp / virtual memory issue (even if I never got this kind of pb with a previous zzul release), 'cause since reboot it works nice and smooth again.

So it works great, as always :+1:

The extreme limit of wisdom, that is what the public calls madness.
0

#15 User is offline   PetitMinou 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 08-March 09

Posted 08 March 2009 - 02:06 PM

Hello,
Just to give you some feedback, 'cause we don't look to be a lot of concerned folks.

First I have been running it for two days and everything seemed working fine.

But after a reboot, at a second launch I discovered it was impossible to sort the files in order of priority and worst, that the defined priorities were not considered in the UL.

I returned to 0.49b ZZUL 20080801-2355 which is properly working.
0

#16 User is offline   Tuxman 

  • lizzie and prog-rock fanatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,608
  • Joined: 26-July 04

Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:11 PM

I'm not quite sure if it's an actual ZZUL bug but sometimes it shows a wrong value for uploaded data in shared files... ex.: I got a file of 9 MB size with 1 upload but the SharedFilesWnd tells me that 18 MB were uploaded... the particular file is on PowerShare, but others are, too...

(Using AnalyZZUL, no code changes around this part though.)

:confused:
[ eMule beba ] :: v2.72 released, v3.00 in the works ...
- feel the lightweight! - featuring Snarl support, the Client Analyzer and tits!
Coded by a Golden eMule Award winner and most people's favorite modder!
..........................................
Music, not muzak:
Progressive Rock :: my last.fm profile
..........................................
eMule user since 0.28 ...
-[ ... and thanks for all the fish! ]-
0

#17 User is offline   Z0eb 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 11-March 09

Posted 11 March 2009 - 12:25 AM

View PostPetitMinou, on Mar 8 2009, 02:06 PM, said:

But after a reboot, at a second launch I discovered it was impossible to sort the files in order of priority and worst, that the defined priorities were not considered in the UL.

I returned to 0.49b ZZUL 20080801-2355 which is properly working.



Confirmed
0

#18 User is offline   CiccioBastardo 

  • Doomsday Executor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Italian Moderators
  • Posts: 5,541
  • Joined: 22-November 03

Posted 11 March 2009 - 10:27 AM

View PostZ0eb, on Mar 11 2009, 01:25 AM, said:

View PostPetitMinou, on Mar 8 2009, 02:06 PM, said:

But after a reboot, at a second launch I discovered it was impossible to sort the files in order of priority and worst, that the defined priorities were not considered in the UL.

I returned to 0.49b ZZUL 20080801-2355 which is properly working.



Confirmed


Hi ZZ,
I've just managed to make a partial merge of my BastarD mod with ZZUL code and I have seen that there are some missing break instructions in the various cases for the sorting functions in some listers (can't remember which one exactly now).
That may be the cause for some not working sorting criteria.

I don't know when I'll finish the complete merging process and have a working bin, but I'll have a deeper look in how the new sorting functions work then.
The problem is not the client, it's the user
0

#19 User is offline   zz 

  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Debugger
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Joined: 30-November 02

Posted 11 March 2009 - 05:36 PM

I'll take a look at it when I get the time. If anyone likes to, feel free to make things easy for me by posting diffs or pointing out where in the code the fail is. :)

/zz B)
ZZUL - get control of your uploads: ZZUL Forum
0

#20 User is offline   CiccioBastardo 

  • Doomsday Executor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Italian Moderators
  • Posts: 5,541
  • Joined: 22-November 03

Posted 11 March 2009 - 07:52 PM

You are right, I was very vague and the amount of code is huge.
Tomorrow I think I'll have a bit more time to give merging a new shot.
BTW, as I have done a double merge (I have merged my code with yours and now I'm merging official with the previous results) it may be that it was me missing those breaks during the first merging process. I'll make a better report tomorrow (I hope).
The problem is not the client, it's the user
0

  • Member Options

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users