Feature Requests
#21
Posted 02 September 2006 - 09:22 PM
@all who want the protocol-encryption:
I hope it's now obvious why I waited for official emule and didn't implement Davids encryption. I hope the new Protocol Obfuscation is a real improvement for the network.
#22
Posted 03 September 2006 - 02:10 AM
:-)
This post has been edited by welldl: 03 September 2006 - 02:32 AM
#23
Posted 05 September 2006 - 10:05 AM
Then are you considering on introducing NAT-T into Xtreme?
desgined to be 100% compatible with Win 2000/XP
ReactOS Project - Tester and Polish translation team member
Now LowID to LowID connections are possible thanks to the first NAT & FireWall Traversal mod: NeoMule.
#24
Posted 05 September 2006 - 01:08 PM
and for the next version also no other new features are planed... first I need a stable 0.47b version. And at some points there are a lot todo.. Xtreme is too complex todo a simple merging.
#25
Posted 11 September 2006 - 08:22 AM
Rapid_Mule, on Sep 1 2006, 06:28 PM, said:
This would be very nice...and can be added a sort of disclaimer saying "don't ask when a pending future will be added or your post will be deleted" or something like that.
Anyway, has xtreme some kind of faster endgame? If not, do you think you will add in a next future netf-warp implementation or something similar?
#26
Posted 11 September 2006 - 09:11 AM
#27
Posted 28 September 2006 - 09:36 AM
I could have the function to activate/disactivate the flags?
Alternative: I can remove from the folder /conf the file ip-to-country.csv? I obtain the same thing?
I waited. Thk
#28
Posted 28 September 2006 - 09:44 AM
Quote
thatīs the prefered way. If I put only a switch into the mod, it can be switched on and off.. which means the flags are always loaded but the user decide to show it or not. But if you delete/rename the cvs file emule donīt load it and you save some RAM.
#29
Posted 28 September 2006 - 11:42 AM
Quote
are always loaded but the user decide to show it or not.
nevertheless I, with an other mod, have noticed minor a consumption of ram (approximately 8/10 mb) putting the flags in off
#30
Posted 29 September 2006 - 11:10 AM
I would work like this: I request a file to you in urgent mode and I have uploaded some files to you in the past.
So to calculate the ratio
Actual system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 2 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total + 2)
Proposed system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 4 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total x 2 + 2)
Uploaded Total = Uploaded Total / 4 (but only when the top of the queue is reach, to avoid lose credits without geting the file)
This way I would be "spending" my credits to get a file faster.
Advantages:
- The would reduce the differences between new and old clients. (between richs and poors )
- It would permit get a file faster for special occasions.
- It would give benefits to the typical uploader.
Well, what do you think?
#31
Posted 29 September 2006 - 01:04 PM
dieguti, on Sep 29 2006, 11:10 AM, said:
I would work like this: I request a file to you in urgent mode and I have uploaded some files to you in the past.
So to calculate the ratio
Actual system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 2 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total + 2)
Proposed system:
if Uploaded Total < 1MB => Ratio = 1
elseif Downloaded Total = 0 => Ratio = 10
elseif Ratio = the lowest of Ratio1 and Ratio2
Ratio1 = Uploaded Total x 4 / Downloaded Total
Ratio2 = SQRT(Uploaded Total x 2 + 2)
Uploaded Total = Uploaded Total / 4 (but only when the top of the queue is reach, to avoid lose credits without geting the file)
This way I would be "spending" my credits to get a file faster.
Advantages:
- The would reduce the differences between new and old clients. (between richs and poors )
- It would permit get a file faster for special occasions.
- It would give benefits to the typical uploader.
Well, what do you think?
consider using the lovelace credit system by either switching to scarangel or implenting it on your own.
[Imagine there was a sarcasm meter right here!]
No, there will not be a new version of my mods. No, I do not want your PM. No, I am certain, use the board and quit sending PMs. No, I am not kidding, there will not be a new version of my mods just because of YOU asking for it!
#32
Posted 29 September 2006 - 02:43 PM
#33
Posted 29 September 2006 - 02:50 PM
#34
Posted 29 September 2006 - 02:52 PM
#35
Posted 29 September 2006 - 03:57 PM
What I propose is a better download now and a worse download during a period, until I gain credits again.
Furthermore, the credit system generates differences between newbies and veterans, and every time are greater. This system could alliviate the problem.
Sometimes you must run to get the bus and later you will necessarily rest.
I can't see what is so bad of this mechanism.
Edit: corrections, my english is very bad
This post has been edited by dieguti: 29 September 2006 - 04:11 PM
#36
Posted 29 September 2006 - 04:15 PM
#37
Posted 29 September 2006 - 10:35 PM
Xman1, on Sep 29 2006, 06:15 PM, said:
A leecher couldn't request an urgent file without MB uploaded previously.
You could force to have at least x MB uploaded to the client, not counting the credits of the last d days.
I dont see the potential abuse more than the credit system has itself.
#38
Posted 30 September 2006 - 05:14 PM
Syst3m Crash3r 480, on Aug 23 2006, 08:48 PM, said:
Excuse me, Xman1, but I up this post since the discussion became focused on NAT Traversal and similar...
Could you add this feature, please?
Best regards and good work!
#39
Posted 02 October 2006 - 12:08 PM
Would it be possible to see ZZ's Powershare In Xtreme mod?
#40
Posted 02 October 2006 - 12:15 PM